It must be said, that the workshops for teachers
had been carried out on the 10th and 25th of January
and on the 2nd of February of 2005. This possibly
justifies the few accesses during January. During the
Easter holidays, that occurred between the 23rd of
March and 3rd of April, the LMS was not available,
for maintenance reasons.
During January and February the teachers
accessed the LMS more times. These values are
justified by the necessity of previous configuration
and the insertion of contents onto their subjects, to
use the LMS later on in their classes.
Between January and March there was an
increasing number of registrations, stabilizing, with
a small decrease in value in April.
The activities used more often by the teachers
are the resources, the forums and assignments, and
the ones that register less use are the glossaries, the
lessons and the quizzes.
The resources are the main activity chosen by
the teachers, probably because it is the easiest way
to access and provide documentation to students,
therefore eliminating the necessity of physical
delivery.
The forums were also very used by teachers
essentially for the accomplishment of group work
and for the debate of themes related to their subject.
Teachers also used activities like assignments,
probably because they are simple to suggest, to
program and to correct. Perhaps due to the time of
preparation, lessons and quizzes were not as used.
However, teachers do recognize their importance.
The evaluation process only took into account
those teachers that used PAOL. Among those, only
the classes that were not delivered to the same group
of students were taken into account in the second
phase of the analysis. The first stage clearly
demonstrated that the highest number of subjects on-
line occurred in the Languages and Secretarial Skills
course, with 12 different subjects contemplated. This
constituted 32% of the total number of subjects on-
line.
As to the total number of teachers using PAOL
in ISCAP: it seems to be a considerable number of
teachers that have adhered to the production of on-
line contents in such a short time.
2
nd
Stage – Evaluation – Questionnaire analysis
As we’ve said, the analysis of the
questionnaires was based on the subjects and users
that weren’t repeated (as there are several subjects in
the same course, it would be not correct to consider
all the questionnaires answered, because we’d be
duplicating the results).
As to the number of teachers using PAOL,
some of them duplicated the contents because they
had the same subject in different courses. It was also
noted that some didn’t answer the questionnaires
appropriately, or didn’t answer them at all, so we
just considered a part.
The number of teachers using PAOL was
considerable right from the beginning (a total of 28
teachers out of 220) and everyday more and more
teachers are adhering. However only 21 out of the
28 answered the questionnaires appropriately. There
were 37 subjects on-line, 30 of which were
considered in this study.
The evaluation criteria were as follows:
- User’s profile
- Type of Internet access, conditions and
user’s resources
- Evaluation of on-line contents (subjects)
- LMS performance evaluation
- Users overall level of satisfaction with LMS
In this study we asked if the contents available
on-line for each subject would be sufficient without
the traditional classes, so we could foresee the
possibility of migrating the subjects to e-learning
courses. However, 61,49% of the students (as
opposed to 31,51%) claimed that the contents were
not sufficient. The main reasons given to explain
their position, was considerable importance given to
human intervention as this gave them the possibility
of contacting the teachers easily (they seemed
concerned with the teachers availability).
Traditional classes were preferred. Students
were also asked to compare traditional classes with
on-line lessons. 48,98% of the students referred to
them as the same, 26,19% classified on-line as being
worst while 24,83%, considered them better.
8 STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS
The analysis of the questionnaires allowed us to
verify that 87,79% of the students, were satisfied
with the LMS (only 12,21% expressed a different
opinion). Some difficulties were noted in terms of
access (31,72%), file uploads (13,1%) and file
downloads (7,59%). Students also expressed the
existence of unnecessary steps to locate the contents,
and difficulties in using forums. They were not
satisfied with the organization teachers used;
claimed to have an excessive number of contents
available, and expressed difficulty in using the LMS.
8,28% of the students questioned commented on the
fact that the LMS wasn’t available during the Easter
holidays.
The importance given to this initiative and its
impact in students’ academic life was also
considered. 96,49% of the students questioned
considered this initiative extremely important as
AN EXPERIENCE OF THE USE OF “MOODLE” AT ISCAP - A Case study
421