However, at the same time the global information society trend that is boosted with
several governmental actions leaves no room for interpretations. Government, minis-
tries, local administrations, chamber of commerce etc. have a significant impact on
the current and forthcoming role of ICT in all aspects of life. Therefore, we included
views from the current national-oriented information society and entrepreneurship
literature (e.g. [4], [6], [9], [10], [11]). One conclusion is that technical infrastructure
is believed to be adequate enough to provide means for efficient, high quality proc-
esses and interactions between all stakeholders (companies, customers, subcontrac-
tors, legislation, suppliers, employees, etc. worldwide). This in some sense means that
a part of SMEs will disappear and new, information intensive and high education
requiring businesses emerge (e.g. [8], [12], [16]). Still, before these scenarios and
related utopia (or dystopia), we need to understand more deeply the connections be-
tween high quality information, its creation and processing. And we need to connect
these to the information security as a natural part of business continuity of SMEs in
order to find out what the overall change process is about. Key question is to find out
what security activities are worth of investment in different types of SMEs in their
journey to information society as a part of infostructure as Snyder [6] calls it.
Our objective is to form a picture of the current level of traditional technical biased
information security in Finnish SMEs from one region and compare it to other stud-
ies, to seek out their comprehension of ICT trends in relation to their business in
order to classify the expectations related to IT itself and their business and the busi-
ness line in general. Empirical data is gathered with a questionnaire. Finally some
thoughts are gathered upon the company’s perception of management of information
(data) and the activities that are related to the creation and use of the valuable organ-
izational business information by employees (or other relevant actors).
We have two views on business: 1) ensuring the core business performance (conti-
nuity from employees and their knowledge and performance and high quality out-
come) and 2) appropriate level of securing activities from misusages and damages. In
traditional setting the latter is at least partly quite robust concept of required informa-
tion security activities in medium or large organizations. These governmental of
commercial guidelines try to cover all organizational areas. Yet, they are at their best
in large organizations. Due to lack of resources and special knowledge of the various
areas of information security issues, micro, small and medium-sized companies have
different operational situations from which they reflect the need for information secu-
rity and business continuity assurance activities. We are aware that e.g. in Finland at
the moment there are many attempts to fill this knowledge gap. But based on our
experience it easily happens that the information security and IT are separated from
the actors and activities. This would lead to impractical and unrealistic solutions
which do not help the SME to improve its securing activities and business continuity.
At the same time the business environment is changing, and globalization, net-
working, mobility etc. take place ([1], [2], [4], [5], [17], [18]). Thus, our first view
above refers to the fact that all businesses face the situation where the amount and the
role of information and knowledge increase. And thus the roles of the actors on the
scene increase. How different types of companies position themselves and their ac-
tivities that relate to ensuring business continuity at current situation? The act-
oriented view [3] demands us to try to find out where the high quality information is
created, how it is used and stored, and by whom. A provocative argument for this is
82