
 
and  high  school  PE  teachers  in  Special  Region  of 
Yogyakarta is referee training and coaching training 
for  specific  sport  branch.  Meanwhile,  professional 
development that is based on working achievement 
is tutor training and presenting training. 
Professional  development  activities  are 
supported  by  a  fund  that  is  guaranteed  by  the 
authority and teachers need not to feel burdened by 
the  funding  problem.  However,  teachers  feel  they 
have problem with the scheduling in which  the time 
do  not  align  with  their  schedules.  Moreover, 
professional  development  activities  are  considered 
taking too much time.  
 
4.2  Suggestion 
 
Based  on  the  results  of  this  study,  it  is  concluded 
that  some  issues  cannot  yet  be  solved.  Therefore,  
some  suggestions  can  be  formed  to  improve  the 
activities  in  developing  teachers’  professionalism. 
The  suggestions  are:  giving  different  kinds  of 
materials,  which  means  that  the  materials  given 
should  focus  on  each  teacher’s  profession;  giving 
longer time for practice activities so it will be easier 
for  teachers  to  understand  it;  placing  the  teachers 
according to their profession so they are able to help 
one another. 
REFERENCES 
Armour,  K.  M.,  and  Yelling,  M.,  2007.  Effective 
Professional  Development  for  Physical  Education 
Teachers:  The  Role  of  Informal,  Collaborative 
Learning, Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 
26 (2): 177–200. 
Armour, K., 2006. Physical Education Teachers as Career-
Long  Learners:  A  Compelling  Research  Agenda. 
Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 11 (3): 203–
207. 
Armour,  K.M  &  Yelling,  M.R.,  2004.  Continuing 
Professional  Devolepment  for  Experienced  Physical 
Education  Teachers:  Towards  Effective  Provision. 
Journal Sport, Education and Society, 9(1). 95-114. 
Bechtel,  P.  A.,  and  O’Sullivan,  M.,  2006.  Effective 
Professional  Development:  What  We  Now  Know. 
Journal  of  Teaching  in  Physical  Education  25  (4): 
363–378. 
Danim,  Sudarwan.,  2002.  Inovasi  Pendidikan:  Dalam 
Upaya  Peningkatan  Profesionalisme  Tenaga 
Kependidika,. Pustaka Setia. Bandung. 
Darling-Hammond,L.  &  McLaughlin,  M.  W.,  2011. 
Policies that support profesional development in an era 
of reform. Kappan, 92(6), 81-92. 
Deddy, Mulyana., 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, 
PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung. 
Garret, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., 
Yoon,  K  S.,  2001.  What  makes  professional 
development effective? Results from a national sample 
of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 
38(4), 915-945. 
Heidorn,  B., 2014. Professional  development in physical 
education. Journal of Physical Education. Recreation 
& Dance, 86(1), 3–5. 
Heidorn,  Brent.,  2015.  Professional  Growth  and 
Development  in  Physical  Education:  A  Focus  on 
PETE  Students.  Journal  of  PhysicalEducation. 
Recreation & Dance, 86:9. 
Lux,  K.  M.,  2010.  How  to  raise  the  status  of  physical 
education  at  your  school.  Journal  of  Physical 
Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(8), 40–42. 
Lynn, S. K., & Woods, A. M., 2010. Following the yellow 
brick  road:  A  teacher’s journey. Journal of Teaching 
in Physical Education, 29,54–71. 
Moleong, Lexy J., 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, 
Penerbit PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, Bandung. 
Mulyana,  Deddy.  2010.  Ilmu  Komunikasi:  “Suatu 
Pengantar, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung. 
Parker, M., Patton, K., Madden, M., & Sinclair, C., 2010. 
From committee to community: the development and 
maintenance  of  a  community  of practice.  Journal  of 
Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 337-357. 
Patton,  K.,  Parker,M.,  and  Pratt,  E.,  2013.  Meaningful 
Learning  in  Professional  Development:  Teaching 
without  Telling.  Journal  of  Teaching  in  Physical 
Education 32 (4): 441–459. 
Permenneg  PAN  dan  RB  No  16  Tahun  2009.  Jabatan 
Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya, Sinar Grafika. 
Jakarta.  
Pink,  Sarah,  2007.  Doing  Visual  Ethnography,  Second 
Edition,  Images.  Media  a  n  d  Representation  in 
Research. SAGE Publications Ltd. London. 
Prayitno,  2009.  Dasar  Teori  dan  Praktis  Pendidikan. 
Grasido. Jakarta.  
Putnam, R. T. & Borko, H., 2000. What do new views of 
knowledge and thinking have to say about research on 
teacher  learning?.  Educational  Researcher,  29(1),  4-
15. 
Rachman,  Hari  A.  Hamid  A.  &  Caly  S.,  2015.  Analisis 
Kebutuhan  Diklat  Guru  PJOK  Pasca  UKG  Tahun 
2015, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta.  
Setiawan,  Caly.,  2015.  Memaknai  Pelatihan  Kita. 
Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta. 
Sugiono, 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, 
Dan  Kombinasi(Mixed  Methods),  ALFABETA. 
Bandung.  
Suhartono,  S.,  2008.  Wawasan  pendidikan:  Sebuah 
pengantar pendidikan, Ar-Ruzzmedia. Yogyakarta. 
Undang-undang  RI  no  14  tahun  2005.  Undang-undang 
Guru dan Dosen, Sinar Grafika. Jakarta. 
Usman, M.U.,  2009.  Menjadi Guru Profesional,  Remaja 
Rosdakarya. Bandung.  
 
YISHPESS and CoIS 2019 - The 3rd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS
2019) in conjunction with The 2nd Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2019)
98