Crowdfunding: Development of Private Investment in the
Agricultural Region
Shamil Arslanov
1a
and Karina Baliyants
1b
1
Institute of Social and Economic Research of the Dagestan Federal Research Center of the RAS, Makhachkala, Russia
Keywords: Investments, crowdfunding, region, financial instruments, digital economy.
Abstract: The aim of the study is to determine the main directions and problems of the development of crowdfunding
in the regions of the Russian Federation, as well as to determine the prospects of the tools of crowdfunding
in the agricultural sector of the economy. The possibilities of developing crowdfunding in agriculture in the
region are investigated. The main problems of the development of crowdfunding technologies in modern
conditions are identified, the features of the implementation of crowdfunding investments are established with
the specification of the specifics of legal regulation and opportunities for the development of crowdfunding.
The accompanying risks inherent in crowd investments are considered. According to the results of the study,
the features and specifics of the crowdfunding tools as an alternative mechanism for the development of
private investment are established. The results of the study can be applied both in the course of the formation
and implementation of regional socio-economic policy as a whole, and its structural elements separately.
1 INTRODUCTION
Today, the Republic of Dagestan, being the
southernmost region of the Russian Federation, with
a population of more than 3 million people and an
area of 50.3 thousand square kilometers, being a
predominantly agricultural region, has only a 20
percent share of agriculture in the Gross Regional
Product.
Such a small share of agriculture in the GRP
indicates that the agricultural sector of the Republic
of Dagestan is in dire need of an influx of investment.
The lack of financial and investment funds in the
republic is explained by the current unfavorable
investment climate.
The reasons for the unfavorable investment
climate of the Republic of Dagestan are primarily:
(Arslanov Sh, 2020)
high risks of investment activity;
low level of regulatory and legal regulation of
investment activities;
lack of investor protection mechanisms and
investment processes;
uncertainty of state mechanisms for
supporting investment projects.
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-8610
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6407-7774
The existing regional experience of attracting
investment in agriculture cannot boast of successful
projects. Rather, on the contrary, there are frequent
court proceedings on "priority" regional investment
projects.
In such conditions, even those who have
successfully started their activities, the enterprises of
the agricultural industry, finding themselves in a
difficult situation, do not have a real opportunity to
use the mechanisms of support and recovery from the
state authorities. A striking example of this is the
recently announced bankruptcy of the Kikuni plant.
The current situation, actualizes the search for
new innovative opportunities to attract private capital
as an investment resource that allows the
development of agriculture in the region. (Dokholyan
S.V., 2020)
In our opinion, such investment tools should be
crowdfunding technologies.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
Considering crowdfunding and crowdinvesting
(Ahlers G., 2015) as a tool for improving the
Arslanov, S. and Baliyants, K.
Crowdfunding: Development of Private Investment in the Agricultural Region.
DOI: 10.5220/0010693300003169
In Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference "Ensuring the Stability and Security of Socio-Economic Systems: Overcoming the Threats of the Crisis Space" (SES 2021),
pages 95-98
ISBN: 978-989-758-546-3
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
95
agricultural sector of the region, it is necessary to ask
the following question: what is the best way to
organize and implement crowdfunding technologies
in the agriculture of the republic?
The solution to this issue is not new and there is a
positive experience of other regions.
For example, the project "LavkaLavka", created
by Boris Akimov, deserves attention. Which is the
embodiment of the implementation, based on
crowdfunding technologies, of the interaction of
agricultural producers and end (urban) consumers.
The LavkaLavka project began in 2009 when B.
Akimov organized a digital resource for the sale of
natural village food. The essence of the project was to
give the residents of the metropolis the opportunity to
buy natural products directly from the farm, so to
speak "first-hand".
The project made it possible for any farmer to
present their products on the site, subject to its
thorough verification and certification. The idea of
reducing intermediaries between the consumer and
the producer of agricultural products became
profitable, as the consumer received complete
information about the quality of the product, and
producers received a new market where customers
were willing to pay for natural products.
The LavkaLavka project was implemented
without attracting bank loans, based on the collection
of financial funds among the farmers and buyers
themselves. That is, B. Akimov himself acted as the
organizer, and buyers and farmers financed a
mutually beneficial project.
Organizationally, "LavkaLavka" is a limited
liability company, in which private investors own
49%.
Of the fee announced by the organizers in the
amount of 5 million rubles, one half was financed by
potential buyers, and the second by farmers. Each
funded project received a 20% discount, and at the
time of opening, the store had about 5 thousand such
customers.
Another example of creating a crowd-investment
platform in the field of agriculture is the Internet
portal "Rublemania". Which, according to the
creators, should become the first investment platform
in Russia, allowing to direct the collected private
investments to the revival of the country's agriculture.
The project is implemented only on the basis of
attracted funds from private investors, implementing
the principle of "profitable investment in agriculture".
According to the project "RubleMania",
absolutely any investor automatically becomes a co-
owner of the project in which he invests, and,
according to the organizers, receives a guaranteed
profit of 18% of the investments made.
It should be noted that crowdinvesting and equity
crowdfunding are innovative and at the same time
alternative financial instruments for generating
investment resources based on attracting an unlimited
number of investors (Belleflamme P., 2014).
Crowdfunding, in our opinion, should become
very popular in the Republic of Dagestan, because as
an alternative financial instrument, it allows you to
finance startups, as well as all "young" projects that
need additional investment, without incurring
burdensome interest.
At the same time, an investor who invests his
funds in projects implemented on the basis of
crowdfunding technologies gets the opportunity to be
involved in a large and significant project (Bi S.,
2017).
Therefore, crowdinvesting platforms are also an
attractive opportunity for anyone who wants to
receive passive income, since the so-called
"promising" level of profitability of projects on such
platforms significantly exceeds the profitability of
other types of passive income.
The development of crowd technologies in
agriculture of the republic, in our opinion, will have a
very favorable impact on the entire socio-economic
system of the region, and will certainly contribute to
the achievement of the following strategic goals and
objectives:
development of small and medium-sized
businesses in the agricultural sector of the economy;
establishing the production and consumption
of domestic agricultural products (which will
accelerate the process of import substitution and
reduce the consequences of international sanctions).
increasing the investment attractiveness of the
region.
At the same time, it should be remembered that
the revival of agriculture in the region is a very labor-
intensive and costly process that cannot be
implemented without attracting the necessary amount
of funding.
Therefore, the use of crowdfunding tools should
be exactly the starting point for the rise of agriculture
in the region, allowing you to create innovative
projects for small and medium-sized businesses with
the maximum participation of investors-consumers of
agricultural products.
The development of alternative innovative
financial instruments, in the context of the
digitalization of the entire global economic space, is
gaining a significant role in the investment process
(Brown T.E., 2017). And, accordingly, requires its
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
96
own significant organizational, economic and
regulatory development, which allows to exclude the
risks of dishonesty in the implementation of
investment activities.
Let's take a closer look at the problems associated
with the implementation of crowd technologies as a
tool for attracting private investment resources.
The main issue of investment is the issue of
working out investment risks. Crowd technologies,
being low-risk, do not completely exclude the
investment risk that investors take on (Buttice V.,
2017).
In this context, crowdfunding does not change the
principles and mechanisms inherent in investing
(with the exception of projects based on donations).
Accordingly, an important problem of the
development of crowd technologies is the risks
characteristic of innovative projects. For example, the
organizers of an investment project bear the risk of
borrowing an original business idea. This is due to the
fact that it is necessary to voice your idea in order to
attract financial resources for its implementation. In
this aspect, the principle of transparency and
openness creates the risk of unfair use of other
people's ideas and technologies.
The same principle of openness precludes the
protection of an idea through the protection of both
industrial and intellectual property rights.
If you look at this problem from the other side, it
is unlikely that a large number of projects will be
announced on digital platforms that need to protect
the uniqueness of the idea and technology. Existing
projects show us that in most cases, projects that bring
social benefits are implemented with relatively small
investments. The average income of Russians and
their lack of desire for technical innovation make it
almost impossible to finance technologically
complex projects.
However, the possibility of participating in a
small part of technologically complex projects based
on digital platforms is not excluded, in this case,
crowdfunding allows large companies to attract
additional sources of funding.
In this case, the use of crowdfunding technologies
as a method of co-financing sufficiently large and
ambitious projects will be considered as a competitive
advantage in attracting investment resources (Chan
R., 2017).
Quite another thing is the risks of investors, which
are inversely proportional to the investor's ability to
predict the success of the project and prospects.
At the same time, digital platforms are not
responsible for the feasibility and success of the
declared project, since this is not included in the list
of their tasks and powers (Guerini M., 2016).
This does not exclude, but rather encourages the
desire of the organizers of digital platforms to
thoroughly understand the proposed project together
with its organizers, in order to make sure of the
reliability of their intentions. Only this approach
allows, to date, to avoid dishonesty in the field of
crowd investment.
Control over the use of the collected financial
resources is not exactly a risk, but only an actual issue
that needs its own regulatory and legal elaboration.
The lack of legal regulation in this area will sooner or
later lead to problems.
At the same time, digital platforms that implement
crowdfunding activities are not subject to the Law
"On Countering the Legalization (Laundering) of
Proceeds from Crime and the Financing of
Terrorism", which practically excludes the influence
of special services on their activities.
Of course, the development of crowd technologies
is a stimulating factor for the development of the
economies of the regions of our country. Therefore,
competitive advantages will be given to those regions
that can form a sufficiently successful digital
investment potential, and we are talking not only
about small and social projects, but also rather
significant and large regional projects.
With regard to the regional aspect of
crowdfunding, it can be argued that they will achieve
the following qualitative indicators:
increase the investment activity of all
segments of the population;
improve the investment potential of the
region.
This makes the development and popularization
of crowd investments in the Russian regions a
strategic priority for their investment and digital
development. And it creates an objective need to
make changes in the legal and economic spheres of
the region, which in turn will allow us to solve the
following tasks:
determine the possibilities of crowd
technologies in relation to their practical application;
popularize crowd technologies in society and the
business community.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
It is determined that the development of modern
crowd investments is a promising tool for improving
the economies of the regions of our country. The
absolute importance of alternative financial
Crowdfunding: Development of Private Investment in the Agricultural Region
97
instruments lies in the ability to implement vital
financing for startups and "young" projects that need
investment, without incurring burdensome interest.
The necessity of using the tools of crowdfunding
in agriculture as a starting point for its rise, and a
mechanism for creating innovative projects of small
and medium-sized businesses with the maximum
participation of investors-consumers of agricultural
products is justified.
The tasks that will be achieved through the
introduction of crowd technologies in the agriculture
of the region are identified, which include:
development of small and medium-sized
businesses in the agricultural sector of the economy;
establishing the production and consumption
of domestic agricultural products (which will
accelerate the process of import substitution and
reduce the consequences of international sanctions).
increasing the investment attractiveness of the
region;
to develop the investment potential of the
region, through "digital" platforms for the formation
of investment resources.
The factors hindering the development of
crowdfunding both in Russia and its regions are
identified, the most significant of which is the
regulatory unsettled nature of crowdfunding, which
often leads to their tacit prohibition.
4 CONCLUSIONS
In the current realities of regional economic
development, alternative crowdfunding tools are a
very promising mechanism that can attract significant
investment funds in all sectors of the economy.
Stimulating the development and popularization
of crowdfunding tools in the regions of the Russian
Federation should become a strategic priority for the
intensification of their investment activity.
At the same time, the lack of timely regulatory
regulation of investment processes in the regions is
the reason that some of the tools of crowdfunding
remain under an unspoken ban.
REFERENCES
Ahlers, G., Cumming, D., Günther, C., Schweizer, D.,
2015. Signaling in Equity Crowdfunding. In
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 39(4). pp. 955–
980.
Arslanov, Sh., Abdulaeva, Z., Daitova, A., 2020. Develop
ment of Crowd Investments in the Region:
Opportunities and Challenges. In Proceedings of the
VIII Int.l Scientific and Practical Conf. 'Current
problems of social and labour relations' (ISPC-CPSLR
2020).
Belleflamme, P., Lambert, T., Schwienbacher, A., 2014.
Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. In J. of
Business Venturing. 29(5). pp. 585–609.
Bi, S., Liu, Z.Y., Usman, K., 2017. The influence of online
information on investing decisions of reward-based
crowdfunding. In J. of Business Research. 71. pp. 10–
18
Brown, T. E., Boon, E., Pitt, L. F., 2017. Seeking funding
in order to sell: Crowdfunding as a marketing tool. In
Business Horizons. 60(2). pp. 189–195.
Buttice, V., Colombo, M. G., Wright, M., 2017. Serial
Crowdfunding, Social Capital, and Project Success. In
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 41(2). pp. 183–
207.
Chan, R., Parhankangas, A., 2017. Crowdfunding Innovati
ve Ideas: How Incremental and Radical Innovativeness
Influence Funding Outcomes. In Entrepreneurship
Theory and Practice. 41(2). pp. 237–263.
Dokholyan, S. V., Baliyants, K., Babaeva, Z. Sh., Eminova,
E. M., 2020. Problems of digitization of agriculture and
using information and communication technologies in
the management of the agro-industrial complex. In
Inclusiones J. 2.
Guerini, M., Piva, E., Rossi-Lamastra, C., 2016.
Crowdfunding in Europe: Determinants of Platform
Creation across Countries. In California Management
Review. 58(2). pp. 44–71.
SES 2021 - INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC-PRACTICAL CONFERENCE "ENSURING THE STABILITY AND SECURITY OF
SOCIO - ECONOMIC SYSTEMS: OVERCOMING THE THREATS OF THE CRISIS SPACE"
98