Research on the Mechanism of Organizational Hierarchy on the
Work Attitude of Chinese Local Civil Servants based on Big Data
San Yang
1a
, Xun Zeng
2b
and Jian Kang
1c*
1
School of Public Affairs and Administration, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
No. 2006 Xiyuan Avenue, Chengdu, China
2
School of Management, Sichuan University of Science & Engineering, Zigong, China
Keywords: Civil Servants, Organizational Hierarchy, Work Attitudes, General Self-efficacy.
Abstract: This paper integrates the variables of organizational hierarchy and general self-efficacy that affects civil
servants' work attitudes and constructs a hypothetical model reflecting the relationship between those three
variables. This paper collected questionnaire data from 2353 civil servants in China using the internet
snowballing methods and built a big data database. It found through regression analysis that organizational
hierarchy positively affects local government civil servants' work attitudes: the higher the organizational
hierarchy, the better the work attitudes of local government civil servants; general self-efficacy plays a
mediating role between organizational hierarchy and local government civil servants' work attitudes. The
empirical results of this paper suggest that China needs to pay attention to the improvement of civil servants'
work attitudes at the grassroots level, improve the treatment of civil servants at the grassroots level, improve
the promotion mechanism of civil servants at the grassroots level, and strengthen the humanistic care for civil
servants at the grassroots level, so as to enhance the general self-efficacy of civil servants and achieve the
improvement of civil servants' work attitudes.
1 INTRODUCTION
The work attitude of civil servants in government
departments is one of the important aspects affecting
the effectiveness of service-oriented government
construction, and the study of civil servants' work
attitude has received extensive attention(Zhu 2017.
In 2004, the Chinese government's work report
proposed for the first time that service-oriented
government is the main goal of Chinese government
reform. Many studies have shown that government
performance is significantly influenced by the work
attitudes of government civil servants (Kang 2017).
Many studies have shown that government
performance is significantly influenced by the
attitude of government employees. Currently,
Chinese local government civil servants are facing
multiple political and administrative pressures, which
makes it more challenging to maintain a good work
attitude of local government civil servants. This
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-5125
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5585-7325
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8448-3534
brings the government a realistic question: whether
local government civil servants can maintain good
work attitudes despite the increased intensity of
pressure and thus maintain the level of public
satisfaction with the government. Previous studies on
the factors influencing civil servants' job attitudes
have found that job stress significantly affects civil
servants' job attitudes. However, civil servants at
different organizational levels are subject to different
levels of work stress, so it can be further explored
whether organizational level affects civil servants'
work attitudes. In the real work situation, civil
servants at the grassroots and window level often face
transactional stress, which lasts for a short period of
time and disappears with the processing of affairs,
while civil servants at the top level of the
organizational hierarchy face coordination and co-
ordination stress, which often follows them
throughout their career. In view of this, this paper will
delve into the relationship between organizational
Yang, S., Zeng, X. and Kang, J.
Research on the Mechanism of Organizational Hierarchy on the Work Attitude of Chinese Local Civil Servants based on Big Data.
DOI: 10.5220/0011153900003437
In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Public Management and Big Data Analysis (PMBDA 2021), pages 69-74
ISBN: 978-989-758-589-0
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
69
hierarchy and civil servants' work attitudes and its
mechanism of action, to enrich the related field
research. According to the general self-efficacy
theory, general self-efficacy refers to individuals'
evaluation of their own work ability, including work
competence and work confidence, which will directly
affect people's behaviours. General self-efficacy is
derived from work experience, social experience, and
other aspects (Dong 2010). The first is successful
work experience, the second is alternative experience,
the second is motivation, and the last is emotion. This
paper introduces general self-efficacy in the process
of discussing the influence of organizational level on
civil servants' work attitudes, which has certain
innovative value and exploratory nature, and provides
reference value for other scholars to study the
relationship between organizational level and civil
servants' work attitudes, thus enriching the existing
civil servants' work attitude related models, and also
provides theoretical support for local governments to
improve civil servants' work attitudes and build a
service-oriented government..
2 LITERATURE REVIEW AND
RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS
2.1 Organizational Hierarchy and Civil
Servants' Work Attitudes
Stephen P. Robbins is representative of the concept of
work attitude, stating that work attitude is the attitude
displayed at work, which focuses on various types of
employee perceptions and evaluations of the work
itself and the environment (Robbins 1996). Conte and
other scholars believe that job attitudes consist of job
satisfaction, work engagement and organizational
commitment (Conte 2005). At present, scholars
generally divide job attitudes into job satisfaction,
organizational commitment and work engagement
and apply these three dimensions to develop relevant
scales. Thus, civil servants' job attitudes refer to the
attitudes shown by civil servants at all levels of local
governments in the face of their jobs and work units,
including three major dimensions of job satisfaction,
organizational commitment, and work engagement.
The April 2019 issue of "The China Quarterly"
published an article titled "Serving the People:
Income, Regions, and Citizen Satisfaction with
Government Governance," which suggested that
Chinese citizens' satisfaction with government
governance is influenced by the level of government.
The findings of this study suggest that satisfaction
decreases as the level of government decreases. That
is, public satisfaction changes with organizational
hierarchy. In addition, one of the important
influencing factors in public satisfaction with
government governance is the work attitude of civil
servants. Many cases and news show that grassroots
civil servants have worse attitudes, and often also
show the worst attitudes of window civil servants.
Based on this, this study proposes hypothesis 1.
H1: Organizational hierarchy positively affects
local government civil servants' work attitudes.
2.2 The Mediating Role of General
Self-efficacy
Judge views general self-efficacy as an evaluation of
one's own abilities, including perceptions of one's
ability to accomplish work tasks and organizational
goals and to successfully deal with external
environmental challenges, and it often affects
confidence and performance (Judge 2003). Sherer
notes that individuals with different social
experiences and social exposure, especially those
who have experienced different states of success and
failure, have different perceptions of self-efficacy,
resulting in cognitive differences (Sherer 1982).
Based on this, this study argues that different
organizations have different self-efficacy. Based on
this, this study argues that the general self-efficacy of
civil servants at different organizational levels also
differs due to their past successes and failures, values,
and cognitive levels. People at higher levels in the
organization tend to have deeper experience, higher
cognitive level, and richer work experience, and they
tend to be able to confront failure and thus develop
higher general self-efficacy. People at the lower levels
of the organization tend to be more shallow, less
cognitive, and have less work experience, and they
tend to be unable to face up to failure, thus developing
a lower sense of general self-efficacy. At the same
time, the higher up in the organizational hierarchy, the
more they are responsible for decision-making, so
they are better able to summarize the successes of
others than those at lower levels. In addition, the
higher the level of responsibility, the more attentive
they are to learning from their experiences, so their
general self-efficacy is also higher. At the same time,
the higher up in the organizational hierarchy, the
stronger the emotional control they need to have in
order to solve problems better and faster, so the higher
up in the organization, the higher their general self-
efficacy. Based on this, this study proposes
hypothesis 2.
PMBDA 2021 - International Conference on Public Management and Big Data Analysis
70
H2: Organizational hierarchy positively
influences general self-efficacy.
In a study on the relationship between general
self-efficacy and job attitudes, McDonald and Siegall
noted that general self-efficacy has a positive
relationship with job satisfaction and positively
influences organizational commitment and job
engagement. According to the main claims of social
cognitive theory, people with higher general self-
efficacy have higher self-expectations and show
higher performance in pursuit of higher goals, which
leads to more motivation (Wang 2014). Judge also
suggests that people with higher general self-efficacy
are more demanding, more courageous in the face of
challenges, and less likely to be defeated by setbacks,
thus achieving better job performance and need
satisfaction and higher job satisfaction (Judge 2003).
This leads to better job performance and demand
satisfaction, and higher job satisfaction. At the same
time, higher general self-efficacy leads to higher self-
expectations and higher need satisfaction in the
process of achieving self-expectations, which leads to
greater adherence to the organization and higher
organizational commitment (Zhang 2008). Most
researchers believe that general self-efficacy is
positively related to job satisfaction and to
organizational commitment (Zelars 2001). Based on
this, this study proposes hypothesis 3.
H3: General sense of efficacy positively affects
the attitude of local government civil servants
towards work.
In summary, this paper argues that organizational
hierarchy positively affects work attitudes,
organizational hierarchy positively affects general
self-efficacy, and general self-efficacy positively
affects work attitudes; in other words, general self-
efficacy can mediate the effect of organizational
hierarchy on civil servants' work attitudes, thus
hypothesis 4 is proposed.
H4: General self-efficacy mediates attitudes
toward work in organizational hierarchy and local
government civil servants.
3 STUDY DESIGN
3.1 Data Collection
We collected the questionnaire data by internet
snowballing methods. The data were collected mainly
from civil servants at various levels in Sichuan,
Shandong, Yunnan, and Guangdong in China. The
questionnaires were distributed to civil servants
among MPA students of University D in the form of
online distribution, and the distribution of this paper
was assisted by the discipline inspection department
of Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, in the form of
internal official documents. The survey recovered
2353 valid questionnaires. Among them, 49.51%
were male and 50.49% were female; the number of
people aged 21-30 accounted for 37.1% of the total
number; the number of people aged 31-40 accounted
for 37.48% of the total number. In terms of marital
status, 73.6% of the respondents were married. In
terms of education level, many respondents were
bachelor's degree holders, accounting for 50.36%.
3.2 Variable Operationalization
The organizational hierarchy is divided into street
office or township department, county department,
city department, and provincial department with
reference to the section hierarchy theory. General
self-efficacy refers to the General Self-Efficacy Scale
developed by Schwarzer and his collaborator
Jerusalem and localized operation with the work style
and work characteristics of local government civil
servants in China to make it more in line with civil
servants' group responses (Zhang 2008). Job
satisfaction refers to the job satisfaction scale
developed by Kanman in 1983, and at the same time
combines with the six-factor model of job satisfaction
(Ling 2003). The operationalized definition of job
satisfaction is summarized. Organizational
commitment is based on the Affective Commitment
Scale (ACS) developed by Meyer and Allen in 1997,
and combined with the organizational commitment
scale constructed by scholars such as Ambrose Ling
in the cultural context of China, the operationalized
definition of organizational commitment of local
government civil servants is summarized (Ling
2001). The operationalized definition of work
commitment was summarized by referring to the ten-
question scale developed by Kanungo in 1982
(Kanungo 1982). The results of the reliability test
showed that the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the
questionnaire as a whole and each part of the scale
was greater than 0.8, indicating high reliability.
4 DATA ANALYSIS
4.1 Reliability Test
In this paper, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to
examine the overall reliability of the questionnaire.
The results showed that the questionnaire and each
subscale had high reliability. Principal component
Research on the Mechanism of Organizational Hierarchy on the Work Attitude of Chinese Local Civil Servants based on Big Data
71
analysis in exploratory factor analysis was used to test
the validity of the questionnaire. The results showed
that the validity of the questionnaire was good, and
correlation and regression analysis could be
performed.
4.2 Descriptive Statistics
The mean values of the answers given by the
respondents of each question item involved in this
paper were within the interval of 3.03 to 4.05; the
absolute values of skewness were below 2 and the
absolute values of kurtosis were below 3. According
to the viewpoint proposed by Kline, the sample data
of this study belonged to normal distribution, and it
was determined that the data of this study could be
used to do correlation and regression analysis.
4.3 Correlation Analysis
Organizational level and job satisfaction were
significantly positively correlated (r=0.401, p<0.01);
organizational level and organizational commitment
were significantly positively correlated (r=0.381,
p<0.01); organizational level and job engagement
were significantly positively correlated (r=0.329,
p<0.01); organizational level and general self-
efficacy were significantly positively correlated
(r=0.361, p < 0.01); general self-efficacy and job
satisfaction were significantly positively correlated
(r=0.423, p<0.01); general self-efficacy and
organizational commitment were significantly
positively correlated (r=0.415, p<0.01); and general
self-efficacy and job engagement were significantly
positively correlated (r=0.355, p<0.01). Therefore,
the hypotheses that organizational level positively
affects job attitude, organizational level positively
affects general self-efficacy, and general self-efficacy
positively affects job attitude of local government
civil servants are initially valid. The results of the
correlation analysis in this paper are shown in “Tables
1”.
Table 1: Correlation analysis.
Organizational Levels General self-efficacy
Job satisfaction 0.401** 0.423**
Organizational commitment 0.381** 0.415**
Work input 0.329** 0.355**
General self-efficacy 0.361** /
** The correlation coefficient was significant at the significance level of 0.01 (two-tailed test)
4.4 Regression Analysis
The regression coefficient of organizational hierarchy
on job satisfaction was 0.089 (p < 0.01), indicating
that organizational hierarchy has a significant
positive effect on job satisfaction. The regression
coefficient of organizational hierarchy on
organizational commitment was 0.068 (p < 0.01),
indicating that organizational hierarchy has a
significant positive effect on organizational
commitment. The regression coefficient of
organizational hierarchy and work commitment was
0.097 (p < 0.01), indicating that organizational
hierarchy has a significant positive effect on work
commitment. In summary, it was determined that
organizational hierarchy has a significant positive
effect on work attitudes, and therefore hypothesis 1 is
valid.
In addition, the regression coefficient of general
self-efficacy and organizational hierarchy was 0.083
(p < 0.01), indicating that organizational hierarchy
has a significant positive effect on general self-
efficacy, and hypothesis 2 was judged to be valid.
The regression coefficient of general self-efficacy
on job satisfaction was 0.280 (p < 0.01), indicating
that general self-efficacy has a significant positive
effect on job satisfaction. The regression coefficient
of general self-efficacy on organizational
commitment was 0.258 (p < 0.01), indicating that
general self-efficacy has a significant positive effect
on organizational commitment. The regression
coefficient of general self-efficacy on work
commitment was 0.187 (p < 0.01), indicating that
general self-efficacy has a significant positive effect
on work commitment. In summary, hypothesis 3 was
judged to be valid. The results of the regression
analysis are shown in “Table 2”. The variable names
in the table are used by their acronyms.
PMBDA 2021 - International Conference on Public Management and Big Data Analysis
72
Table 2: Regression analysis.
Models
Unstandardized coefficient
Standardized
coefficient
t VIF
Beta Standard erro
r
Beta
1
Constant
3.549 0.063 - 56.402 -
JS 0.089** 0.018 0.101 4.906 1
OC 0.068** 0.017 0.081 3.937 1
WI 0.097** 0.015 0.129 6.317 1
GSSE 0.083** 0.021 0.081 3.947 1
2
Constant
2.998 0.054 - 55.694 -
JS 0.28** 0.017 0.323 16.549 1
OC 0.258** 0.016 0.315 16.075 1
WI 0.187** 0.015 0.255 12.807 1
** The correlation coefficient was significant at the significance level of 0.01 (two-tailed test)
Model 1 Dependent variable: Organizational
Levels
Model 1 Dependent variable: General Self-
efficacy
We hope you find the information in this template
useful in the preparation of your submission.
4.5 Intermediation Effect Test
We use the causal stepwise regression test method to
test the intermediation effect. The results are shown
in “Table 3”. The variable names in the table are used
by their acronyms.
Table 3: Intermediation effect test.
Independent
variable
Dependent
variable
Beta
Adjusted
R
2
OL JS 0.089** 0.16
OL→GSSE JS 0.066** 0.176
OL OC 0.068** 0.192
OL→GSSE OC 0.047** 0.181
OL WI 0.097** 0.166
OL→GSSE WI 0.082** 0.184
** The correlation coefficient was significant at the
significance level of 0.01 (two-tailed test)
We found that after introducing general self-
efficacy as a mediating variable between
organizational hierarchy and job satisfaction, the
regression coefficient decreased from 0.089 to 0.061
(p < 0.01), indicating that general self-efficacy has a
partial mediating effect between organizational
hierarchy and job satisfaction. After introducing
general self-efficacy as a mediating analysis between
organizational hierarchy and job satisfaction, the
regression coefficient decreased from 0.068 to 0.047
(p < 0.01), indicating that general self-efficacy has a
partial mediating effect between organizational
hierarchy and job satisfaction. After introducing
general self-efficacy as a mediating variable between
organizational hierarchy and job attitudes, the
regression coefficient decreased from 0.097 to 0.082
(p < 0.01), indicating that general self-efficacy has a
partial mediating effect between organizational
hierarchy and job attitudes. In conclusion, general
self-efficacy has a partial mediating effect between
organizational hierarchy and job attitudes, and
hypothesis 4 is judged to be valid.
5 CONCLUSIONS AND
DISCUSSIONS
This paper analyses the role of organizational
hierarchy and general self-efficacy in influencing
civil servants' work attitudes, drawing on section
hierarchy theory and general self-efficacy theory. The
results show that the higher the organizational
hierarchy, the better the work attitudes of civil
servants. At the same time, the higher the
organizational hierarchy, the better the general self-
efficacy of civil servants, which positively affects
their work attitudes. The results of this study show
that the lower the organizational hierarchy, the worse
the work attitude of civil servants. Therefore, the
focus of improving civil servants' work attitudes
should be placed on grassroots civil servants. Ⅰ, pay
attention to the improvement of the work attitude of
grassroots civil servants. Ⅱ, improve the education
and training mechanism of grassroots civil servants.
Ⅲ, improve the treatment of grass-roots civil servants
and strengthen the humanistic care for them. Improve
the promotion mechanism of grassroots civil servants'
positions. Ⅴ, pay attention to improving the general
Research on the Mechanism of Organizational Hierarchy on the Work Attitude of Chinese Local Civil Servants based on Big Data
73
self-efficacy of civil servants and realize the
improvement of general self-efficacy by improving
the self-confidence and emergency response ability of
civil servants, to realize the improvement of civil
servants' work attitude. VI, Improve civil servants'
ideal beliefs and goal consciousness. VII, Enhance
civil servants' sense of professional honour. VIII,
Strengthen the professional competence training of
civil servants.
The report of the 19th National Congress of the
Communist Party of China clearly puts forward the
modernization of government governance,
transforming government functions,
comprehensively promoting the simplification of
government and deepening reform of supervision
methods, and building a service-oriented government
that satisfies the people. Civil servants are the key to
the construction of service-oriented government, and
the work attitude of civil servants is important for
their work goals and organizational goals to achieve.
However, news about poor attitudes of grassroots
civil servants are common in real life, so it is
important to explore the influence of organizational
hierarchy on the attitudes of local government civil
servants and make corresponding suggestions based
on this to improve the work attitudes of local
government civil servants.
The study of organizational hierarchy on the work
attitudes of local government civil servants is
innovative, and this paper proposes a new perspective
to explore the work attitudes of local government
civil servants, while introducing a new variable of
general self-efficacy. At present, most scholars'
research on general self-efficacy has mainly focused
on the study of corporate employees, and less
research has been conducted on the effect of general
self-efficacy on civil servants' work attitudes.
Therefore, this study is exploratory in nature, but
there are certain shortcomings of the study due to its
own subjective and objective conditions. First, the
main respondents come from Sichuan, Shandong,
Yunnan, and Guangdong provinces. Therefore, the
uneven distribution of sample size becomes a
problem. The diversity of respondents can be
increased appropriately in the future. Second, this
study mainly considered the influence of
organizational level on the work attitude of local
government civil servants. Other variables can be
considered in future studies.
REFERENCES
Conte J M, Dean M A, Ringenbach K L, et al. (2005). The
relationship between work attitudes and job analysis
ratings: do rating scale type and task discretion matter?
Human Performance.18, 1-21.
Dong H., Gong J. (2010). Exploring the factors influencing
students' self-efficacy in university English teaching.
Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and
Astronautics (Social Science Edition). 4, 104-106.
Judge T A, Erez A, Bono J, Thoresen C J. (2003). The core
self- evaluations scale: development of a measure.
Personnel Psychology. 56,302-331.
Judge T A, Erez A, Bono J, Thoresen C. J. (2003). The core
self- evaluations scale: development of a measure. 56,
303-331.
Kang J., Zhu X. 2017, Research on the Impact of
Government Organizational Culture on Paternalistic
Leadership Based on Competitive Values Framework.
Proceedings of 2017 International Conference on
Public Administration (12th) & International
Symposium on West African Studies (1st). UESTC
Press.
Kanungo R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work
involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology. 67, 341-
349.
Ling W.C., Zhang Z.C., Fang L.L. (2001). A study of
workers' organizational commitment in China. Chinese
Social Sciences.2, 90-102.
Ling, W.C., Fang, L.L. (2003). Psychological and
Behavioural Measurement. Machinery Industry Press,
Beijing.
Robbins, S. (1996). Organizational behaviours: concepts,
controversies, applications. Prentice Hall, Upper
Saddle River. 7th edition.
Sherer M, Maddux J E, Mercandante B, et al. (1982). The
self-efficacy scale: construction and validation.
Psychological Reports.51, 663-671.
Wang Y., Shi K. (2014). A multi-channel model of factors
influencing innovative behaviours of knowledge-based
employees. Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy
and Social Sciences).3,7-10.
Zelars K L, Hochwarter W A, Perewe P L, Miles A K,
Kiewitz C. (2001). Beyond self-efficacy: interactive
effects of role conflict and perceived collective efficacy.
Journal of Managerial Issues. 13, 483-499.
Zhang H. (2008). A study on the correlation between
general self-efficacy, work stress and work attitude of
corporate employees. Northeast Normal University.
Changchun.
Zhang H. (2008). A study on the correlation between
general self-efficacy, job stress and work attitude of
corporate employees. Northeast Normal University.
Changchun.
Zhu X., Kang J., Liu Y. (2017). Research on the relationship
between local government organizational culture,
leadership behaviours and civil servants' work attitudes.
Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social
Science Edition). 2, 124-133.
PMBDA 2021 - International Conference on Public Management and Big Data Analysis
74