4 CONCLUSIONS
This document proposes an evaluation methodology
using Geospatial tools to address the optimal location
of schools by taking factors such as poor population,
distance, spatial distribution, and road access. In ad-
dition, a case study is analyzed with educational cen-
ters obtaining promising results. The feasibility and
rationality of the method proposed in this document
are verified, considering that it has been applied to the
entire country and its road network. The results show
that 90% of the academic units are in areas where
more than 50% of the poor population is concentrated,
and there is also a road axis for access. It should be
noted that the methodology can be easily adapted to
other analysis scenarios and other study areas such as
health, transport, logistics, etc.
A base political division of the study territory in-
cluded the analysis variable, which allowed obtain-
ing the results. All of this could be applied to lo-
cations that offer a service other than those of the
EMUs, which would work similarly. The main ad-
vantage of using an amalgamation of methodologies
to obtain potential institutions over a conventional
method based on existing functions is having several
considerations for the locations. At the same time,
social inclusion is taken into account, giving way to
more humanly applicable results instead of obtaining
an exclusive result for not having some GIS-based
feature. The result can be adjusted to more conve-
nient locations, being able to carry out the process
as many times as necessary, to obtain a response that
is geographically valid. These results, coming from
a heuristic method, are optimal and conform to the
concepts of Spatial Efficiency. These institutions are
as close to the population and access roads. In ad-
dition, the concept of Spatial Justice could be consid-
ered, where the educational services of the institutions
are distributed in such a way that the largest possible
part of the Ecuadorian territory is covered. Addition-
ally, as future work, other features can be explored,
such as safety and environment, and other techniques
like reverse Voronoi, to find optimal school locations.
REFERENCES
Al-Sabbagh, T. A. (2020). GIS location-allocation mod-
els in improving accessibility to primary schools in
mansura city-egypt.
Boix, G. and Olivella, R. (2007). Los sistemas de infor-
maci
´
on geogr
´
afica (sig) aplicados a la educaci
´
on. el
proyecto pesig (portal educativo en sig). Las com-
petencias geogr
´
aficas para la educaci
´
on ciudadana,
1:23–32.
Botto, G., Detomasi, R., ANEP, and INAU (2015). Bases
metodol
´
ogicas para la planificaci
´
on espacial de servi-
cios de educaci
´
on inicial en uruguay. Accepted: 2018-
12-08T11:50:11Z Publisher: Universidad Nacional de
Luj
´
an.
Brock, M. E. and Schaefer, J. M. (2015). Location matters:
Geographic location and educational placement of
students with developmental disabilities. 40(2):154–
164. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
Bulti, D. T., Bedada, T. B., and Diriba, L. G. (2019). Ana-
lyzing spatial distribution and accessibility of primary
schools in bishoftu town, ethiopia. 27(2):227–236.
Erwig, M. (2000). The graph voronoi diagram with ap-
plications. Networks: An International Journal,
36(3):156–163.
Guti
´
errez, M. (2006). El rol de las bases de datos espaciales
en una infraestructura de datos. In GSDI-9 Conference
Proceedings, pages 6–10.
Jabbar, S. A. and Laffta, S. (2020). Spatial analysis of pri-
vate school sites in al-jihad neighborhood in baghdad-
iraq by using geographic information systems. In IOP
Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineer-
ing, volume 737, page 012247. IOP Publishing.
Llario, J. C. M. (2013). PostGIS 2: an
´
alisis espacial avan-
zado. Juan Carlos Mart
´
ınez Llario.
Murad, A. A., I., A., and A, A. (2020). Using geographical
information system for mapping public schools distri-
bution in jeddah city. 11(5).
Navarrete, R. and Luj
´
an-Mora, S. (2018). Bridging
the accessibility gap in open educational resources.
17(4):755–774.
Navas, G. E., Llerena Paz, R., and Vaca, F. (2019). An
´
alisis
espacial de las unidades educativas del milenio en
el ecuador y su cobertura en zonas de pobreza. LA
GRANJA. Revista de Ciencias de la Vida, 30(2):121–
133.
Okabe, A. and Suzuki, A. (1997). Locational opti-
mization problems solved through voronoi diagrams.
98(3):445–456.
Sezer, A., Deniz, M., and Topuz, M. (2018). Analy-
sis of accessibility of schools in usak city via geo-
graphical information systems (gis). TARIH KULTUR
VE SANAT ARASTIRMALARI DERGISI-JOURNAL
OF HISTORY CULTURE AND ART RESEARCH,
7(5):470–494.
UNICEF (2019). School mapping.
Yan, C., Guo, T., Sun, W., and Bai, J. (2010). Voronoi di-
agrams’ eccentricity measurement and application. In
2010 18th International Conference on Geoinformat-
ics, pages 1–4. IEEE.
GISTAM 2022 - 8th International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management
154