3 METHOD
3.1 General Data Analysis
From April 2020 to April 2021, research work has
been carried out in our hospital, taking patients with
heart failure and lung infection as an example. The 80
patients under the regulations were divided into
groups, and different treatment methods were
applied. They were given simple medication and
combined medication, respectively, and the group
names were control and experiment. In a specific
comparative experiment, in the 40 patients in the
experimental group, the number of males was 23 and
the number of females was 17. The maximum age of
the patients was 88 years old, the minimum age was
61 years old, and the mean was (73.22±4.33) years
old. Among the 40 patients in the control group, there
were 24 males and 16 females. The age range of the
patients was 63-89 years, with an average of
(74.00±4.83) years. The general data of the two
groups of patients were compared under statistical
methods, and the differences in the data were not
significant enough, P>0.05. Shows that the treatment
effect can be compared as a variable.
Inclusion criteria: The patients were in
compliance with the clinical diagnostic criteria for
heart failure complicated with pulmonary infection;
the patients had no history of drug allergy; this study
was approved by the hospital ethics committee and
was carried out after the patient's consent.
Exclusion criteria: patients with malignant
tumors; patients with liver, kidney and other organ
dysfunction diseases, patients with consciousness
disorders.
3.2 Research Methods
Patients in the control group were treated with
traditional Chinese medicine prescriptions. The main
prescriptions included: Ephedra sinica 10g,
Motherwort 30g, Ophiopogon japonicus 30g,
Adenophora 30g, Radix scoparia 15g, Almond 15g,
Gypsum 30g, Peach kernel 15g, Platycodon 10g,
Shegan 10g, Ophiopogon 30g, Danshen 15g,
Mulberry Bark 15g, Roasted Licorice 10g, 1 dose per
day, once a day. If the patient has obvious symptoms
of qi deficiency, atractylodes macrocephala and
astragalus should be added. If the patient has obvious
yang deficiency, Guizhi needs to be added. If the
patient has obvious yin deficiency, it is necessary to
increase Polygonatum and Cornus. If the patient has
obvious congestion, leeches and safflower need to be
added. If the patient has obvious edema, add
Eupatorium and Poria.
In the experimental group, on the basis of
traditional Chinese medicine decoction treatment,
trimetazidine was added with a dose of 20 mg, and
intervention was performed three times a day. Both
groups of patients received 1 month of treatment.
3.3 Observation Indicators
The comparison of treatment effects mainly includes
three indicators: markedly effective, effective and
ineffective. Significant effect mainly refers to the
disappearance of the symptoms of lung infection after
the patient receives treatment; under the X-ray film,
the patient shows that the inflammatory reaction
focus disappears. Effective means that the patient’s
symptoms of pulmonary infection have improved
after receiving treatment; with the help of X-ray
observation, the elimination rate of inflammatory
lesions of the patient is above 60%. Ineffective means
that the patient's clinical symptoms and indicators
have not changed significantly after treatment. The
exclusion invalid rate is the total effective rate.
The hospitalization time and the disappearance
time of related symptoms of the two groups of
patients were compared. The symptoms mainly
included cough, wheezing, and wet rales.
The physical signs of the two groups of patients
were compared, including heart rate (HR), respiratory
rate (RR), arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2),
and arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide
(PaCO2).
3.4 Statistical Methods
The statistical software SPSS20.0 was used as a tool
to perform statistical analysis on the data appearing
in this study. The comparison result of measurement
data (x±s) shall be verified by t value. The
comparison result of the count data (n, %) is verified
by the x2 value. When the result shows P<0.05, it
means that there is a statistical analysis value for the
difference between the groups.
4 RESULTS
4.1 Therapeutic Effect
In terms of treatment effect, the two groups reached
95.00% and 80.00% respectively. In contrast, the
experimental group was higher, and the data
difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).