Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business
Stanislav Popov
1,2 a
, Denys Kolosovskyi
1b
, Michael Radin
2c
, Liudmyla Shokotko
3d
and Oleksandr Astafiev
3e
1,2
Kryvyi Rih National University, V. Matusevych Str., 11, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine
2
Rochester Institute of Technology, USA
3
State University of Economics and Technology, Medychna Str., 16, Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine
Keywords: Economics, Forecasting, Iron Ores, Model, Stoping.
Abstract:
Ukraine’s iron ore mining industry is among the most powerful ones in the world, which account for 90% of
the volume of iron ore products. All iron ore mining enterprises of Ukraine are private. Current conditions of
their operation and prospects for its development bring up the problem of the most accurate forecasting of
economic results of mining by implementation of its key process – ore stoping. This determines profitability
of the business, its competitiveness and possibility of reasonable planning. To solve this problem, the authors
developed a methodology, a system of technical and economic indicators and a computer program to provide
multifactor economic analysis of competitive solutions on stoping and selection of optimal one according to
the forecast economic results of its application. Use of ore value indicators, the value of ore reserves and the
degree of use of the value as a result of stoping makes the basis of this methodology and the system of
indicators. Further development of this work implies creation of systems for modeling the entire process of
underground iron ore mining the key element of which is stoping with forecasting profitability of the business
based on analysis of iron ore market conditions.
1 INTRODUCTION
Currently, Ukraine is in the group of 7 countries with
the most developed iron ore mining industry out of 52
countries carrying out activities. Business structures
that operate in this area in Ukraine are among the
largest. Iron ore enterprises of these structures
account for about 9% of the country’s GDP. In
Ukraine, there are 8 large private iron ore enterprises
which produce up to 87.0 Mt of commercial iron ore
products (concentrate, pellets, sinter ore, blast furnace
and raw ore). About 60% of this volume is consumed
by national private metallurgical enterprises, 40% is
sold in foreign markets (Kindzerskyi, 2013). Business
in the field of iron ore mining is one of the most
profitable and forms a powerful source of the
country’s budget revenues in national and foreign
currencies.
a
https://orcid.org
/0000-0003-4874-997X
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0550-2021
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9951-7955
d
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7294-2003
e
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-3076
Application of the underground method of mining
iron ore deposits is one of important and promising
directions in production performance and
development. This is due to the fact that the specific
technology of this mining method provides the
possibility of economically effective iron ore
extraction at great depths (over 1000 m). At such
depths, the open pit method of mining, which is
currently the main one, is economically inefficient.
In Ukraine, application of the underground
mining method accounts for 15-20% of the volume of
commercial iron ore products. In the near future, their
volumes will grow as the main reserves of iron ore
extend to great depths. Iron ores are already proved to
occur at the depth of 2750 m, and the forecast depths
are 5.0-7.0 km.
Along with this, it should be noted that in order to
achieve the highest economic efficiency of mining
these reserves at great depths, mining enterprises
Popov, S., Kolosovskyi, D., Radin, M., Shokotko, L. and Astafiev, O.
Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business.
DOI: 10.5220/0011348400003350
In Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific Congress Society of Ambient Intelligence (ISC SAI 2022) - Sustainable Development and Global Climate Change, pages 219-229
ISBN: 978-989-758-600-2
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS – Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
219
need to solve a number of complex problems. The
most relevant among them is the need for accurate
forecasting of technical and economic results of iron
ore development according to mining engineering
and economic conditions of its implementation.
(Kaplenko, 2003) (Kaplenko, 2013). These conditions
are very difficult in terms of ore occurrence
characteristics, the situation in the markets of iron ore
products and the markets of production resources.
The need for such forecasting is determined by the
needs for reasonable forecasting of business
profitability, its competitiveness, and justified
planning of business processes (
Kosenko, 2017)
(Popov, 2016).
One of the most important tasks in the field of
such forecasting is determination of technical and
economic results of implementing one of the key
processes of underground mining, namely Stoping.
This is one of the most large-scale, technologically
complex, costly and extremely dangerous processes.
The implementation of this very process provides the
mining enterprise with an ore resource with
characteristics necessary for production of
commercial iron ore products. The volume of
financial costs for its implementation reaches 40-60%
of the cost of extracted ore mass, with an increase in
the mining depth of development, they increase as
well. At the same time, in stoping, significant
technological losses of ore occur, up to 9-15% of the
reserve, and increased dilution of the extracted ore
mass with waste rocks makes up to 10-20% of its
volume. All this negatively affects the economic
results of mining.
This problem can be solved by applying such
technological, technical, parametrical solutions for
implementation of stoping which are optimal, i.e.
ensure achievement of the highest profitability of
mining in specific conditions of its implementation.
This problem can be solved only on the basis of
digitalization of the business in the field of iron ore
mining, i.e. development and use of application-
oriented software means modeling of production and,
in particular, the process of ore stoping and
optimization of its design solutions based on
forecasting the results of mining ore reserves. The
degree of compliance of these solutions with the
target function of optimality directly determines the
profitability of mining, performance of a mining
enterprise, (a business structure can include several
enterprises of this kind), and this is the basis for
formation of economic results and business
efficiency.
To successfully solve this problem, it is necessary
to have, first of all, the method of economic and
mathematical modeling of the stoping process,
considering a wide range of mining and economic
conditions for stoping. In addition, it is necessary to
have a system of indicators that allow correct
assessment of its economic results (
Veduta, 2017).
At present, there is no generally recognized
modeling methodology and system of indicators
available. Developments that exist in this area are
based only on determined values of the integrated
indicator of efficiency profit from implementation
of the result of the Extracted ore mass stoping.
However, they do not solve the important economic
problem that arises in this process, namely,
determining how fully the economic potential (i.e. an
ore reserve with its engineering and economic
characteristics) is used as a result of mining, and this
directly concerns profitability of mining.
According to the above mentioned, the work is
aimed at developing a mathematical model, a set of
indicators and a computer system for modeling the
process of iron ore stoping to predict its results at the
level of the economic activity of the mining enterprise
support. The theoretical basis for their development
is described below.
2 RELATED WORK
The process of ore stoping is carried out at the main
production objects of underground mining enterprises
- Mining blocks. Stoping includes implementation of
a number of so-called Technological processes of
stoping. Specific solutions on the technology of
performing each of them, means of labour
mechanization, parameters of their implementation
determine technical-economic efficiency of stoping
(
Ray, 2016).
In previous years, the urgent need to increase this
efficiency in difficult underground conditions
required development of a whole range of
technological and technical solutions to extract ore,
aimed to improve stoping and eliminate its
shortcomings. These solutions are summarized in a
special document Typical passports of underground
mining systems. Currently, 50 variants of such
systems have been developed in Ukraine. In general,
over 2,500 patterns have been developed for various
conditions of ore in the world.
The passports of mining systems present:
designs of mining blocks based on different
variants of mining systems;
expected technical and economic results of
mining their reserves (productivity of a stope,
labour efficiency, specific length of technological
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
220
workings, expected technological losses of ore,
technological dilution, cost of extracted ore
mass).
criteria for selecting variants of mining systems
(mining depth, ore body thickness and dip,
physical and mechanical properties of ore and
country rocks);
From these passports, based on comparison of the
criteria for mining systems selection and actual
conditions at mining sites of the deposit, variants of
systems for specific blocks are selected. It should be
noted that in practice these conditions are unique and
are not repeated at other mining sites.
On the basis of the selected mining systems,
mining blocks are designed.
However, designing implies certain complexity
consisting in the fact that the right choice of the
mining system does not guarantee its highest
economic results. This situation is due to the fact that
in typical passports there are only fundamental
solutions for block designs and the technology of
stoping treatment for certain simplified forms of ore
bodies, elements of their occurrence. Yet, in practice,
real characteristics of ore bodies have significant
deviations from average values, and this leads to
specific economic results of mining which will
naturally differ from the values indicated in the
passports of the systems. Therefore, in order to obtain
the highest economic efficiency of stoping, the
selected variant of the mining system still needs to be
parametrically adapted to conditions of a particular
block, and there may be several competitive variants
of systems.
At the mining enterprise, there can be from 4 to
20 mining blocks at the same time and it is necessary
to design more and more new blocks as already
exhausted blocks are decommissioned. Designing of
the kind is a constant and continuous process. These
projects are prepared according to a special
instruction, in which unfortunately there is no method
of detailed economic analysis of decisions made
during designing (
Barry, 2006).
Parametrical adaptation of mining systems is
performed through selecting geometrical parameters
of structural elements of the block without violating
the principle design of the system chosen for it. In
addition, when adapting, the parameters of the
stoping technology are calculated, the general scheme
of which is regulated by the passport. Naturally, the
obtained technical and economic results of ore
extraction and its profitability depend on the level of
constructive, technological and parametrical
adaptability of the entire production and
technological complex of a mining unit to specific
geological and mining conditions of its design and
mining of its reserve.
Such adaptation represents a complex, time-
consuming and responsible process in which many
options of different solutions are considered. Its
implementation requires highly qualified designers
with practical experience in technological design and
mining economics. At the same time, each of their
solutions should be not only due to mining factors,
but also economically justified and optimized
according to the criteria for obtaining the highest
economic efficiency. That is why it is necessary to
have an economic and mathematical model of an
appropriate nature and a system of estimated
economic indicators.
The authors have developed a relevant model and
system of indicators. This model is developed on the
basis of formalization of three important
characteristics of the subject of labour: the Value
represented by the ore reserve; the Value of the ore
reserve; the Degree of the value use when mining.
For this purpose, business structures acquire the right
to mine the reserve. This approach to evaluate the
efficiency of stoping is applied for the first time.
Specificity of application of the above
characteristics consists in the following. The purpose
of stoping is to obtain the industrial reserve of ore
from the monolithic ore massif, the required volume
of ore mass which, in its physical condition (crushed
material with a given granulometric composition),
quality (metal content) and economic characteristics
(cost), allows economically efficient processing it
into commercial iron ore products that meet the
requirements of the consumer (a metallurgical
enterprise). At the same time, the closer to these
requirements the characteristics of the mined ore
mass are, the more cost-effectively ore mass is
processed. Up to 40% of ore mined at mining
enterprises, even without detailed optimization of
mining immediately after extraction, meets these
requirements. But that is not sufficient. To achieve
the highest degree of such conformity, it is necessary
to choose the most optimal technological, technical
and parametrical solutions for implementing each
technological process, which make up the structure of
stoping. However, this is currently not performed,
and designers are guided only by common solutions
without their detailed economic analysis.
2.1 The Structure of Stoping
As mentioned above, stoping involves a number of
technological processes that are strictly sequenced
and rigidly related. This sequence is given in Fig. 1.
Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business
221
It is the specifics of execution of these processes
according to the selected solutions that determines the
economic result of stoping in general (
Tradin
Ecjnomics) (Popov, (2020)
(
Martynov,
2010).
Drilling consists in forming systems of blast holes
within the stoping space of the mining block. The
holes are located according to a certain pattern and
have defined length and diameter parameters. To
mine the reserve of one block, 10.0 - 30.0 km of
boreholes are drilled. It should be noted that while
parametrical adaptation of development systems, the
total length of holes can vary significantly in different
variants of drilling operations, and this significantly
affects the economic results of stoping due to the fact
that this process is one of the most costly.
Blasting consists in charging holes with explosives
and forming explosive charges of special structures,
the blasting circuit switching, initiating detonation of
the charges in a certain sequence. Currently, ore is
broken by mass blasting when up to 50.0-100.0 t of
explosives are detonated in one cycle and up to 200.0-
400.0 and sometimes up to 900.0 kt of ore is broken.
Depending on mining conditions, costs for blasting
reach 40-70% of the total cost of stoping.
Ventilation of the block is removal of explosive
gases from the block after detonation of charges in the
stoping space. Ventilation is executed, as a rule, due
to general depression, sometimes by force applying
special ventilation equipment. The need to ventilate
the block requires a significant amount of ventilation
workings that distribute air flows in the block
between different objects. The length of ventilation
workings can make up to 40% of the length of all
types of mine workings in the block.
Figure 1: The schematic diagram of stoping.
Broken ore mass drawing consists in removing
the broken ore mass from the stoping space. Ore mass
drawing can be executed by the gravitational method
or applying special vibration equipment. Productivity
of the ore mass drawing from the block amounts to
800.0-6000.0 t per working shift.
Ore mass transportation consists in moving the
broken ore mass from the stoping space in the block
to the place where it can be hauled to the hoisting
complex of the mine. To perform this process, a
system of technological workings and machines
(scrapers, conveyors, vibro-equipment) operates in
the block.
Dashed arrows in Fig. 1. show that the process of
stoping is an element of a larger production and
technological system of an iron ore mining enterprise
and executed after implementation of a complex of
various processes before and after it. However, in this
scheme stoping is a key process. Each of the
technological processes of stoping makes its
contribution to the formation of its technical and
economic results.
2.2 The Main Factors of Forming
Economic Characteristics of
Stoping
Implementation of all technological processes of
stoping requires appropriate financial investments,
the specific value of which is determined by the
following factors:
characteristics of the raw material resource,
namely ore and its industrial reserve (grade, volume);
mining conditions of ore reserve occurence
(geological, geomechanical, mining-geometric,
hydrogeological);
the nature of technological, technical,
parametrical and organizational solutions for
implementation of stoping;
economic conditions in which a mining
enterprise operates (prices for resources, volume of
costs during construction of the block and mining of
itst reserve, volumes of works).
To determine the expected economic results of
stoping at the stage of preparation of the project for
its implementation, these factors, or rather, their
influence on the economic results of stoping, should
be mathematically formalized and analyzed when
solving economic problems.
The process of iron ore stoping
Drilling
1
Broken ore mass
drawing from
stoping space
Ore mass
transportation
Blasting
2
4
5
entilation
3
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
222
2.3 Theoretical Bases of Development
of Economic and Mathematical
Model of Stoping
According to the above, we will proceed directly to
development of the economic and mathematical
model which describes formation of economic results
of stoping and indicators by which it is possible to
assess the economic efficiency of stoping. This model
and the indicators are a tool for selecting optimal
design solutions for implementing each component of
the technological process of stoping in preparing
designs of mining blocks.
Ore is the subject of stoping. This resource has an
economic characteristic of the Gross Value G
1
(
Subject of labor, 2001) (The concept of value, 2005). By
definition, G
1
represents the market value of a useful
component (in this case Iron) which is contained in
1.0 t of the industrial ore reserve. The value of this
indicator is determined at the stage of geological and
economic evaluation of the ore reserve by the formula
=
=
N
n
m
C
N
P
G
1
1
01,0
(1)
Where
P is the metal price, UAH/t;
C
m
is concentration of metal in ore at geological
sampling sites, %;
N is the number of sampling sites on the deposit,
pcs.
In the process of mining by stages of its
implementation, the industrial reserve of ore moves
from the state of a monolithic rock massif to the state
of extracted ore mass and changes one of its most
important characteristics, namely the content of metal
С
m
.
As a result, the extracted ore mass also acquires a
certain value which is determined by the Extracted
Value indicator G
2
. This indicator determines the cost
of metal which is contained in 1.0 of the mined ore
resource at concentration of metal in it С
mr
and is
calculated by the formula
mr
PСG 01,0
2
=
(2)
The G
2
value is in a certain dependence on the G
1
indicator, but this dependence is not functional,
although it is not accidental. Their relationship
depends on many factors of a natural and man-made
nature.
In G
2
, the initial part is G
1
,, because formation of
G
2
begins with G
1
,. Their relationship can be
described as follows
21
GХG
(3)
This expression suggests that the parameter G
1
is
an element of the set of parameters X that form value
of the parameter G
2
, as the final characteristic of the
development by changing the value of the object of
labor.
The G
1
and G
2
, indicators are important for
assessing changes in the economic nature of ore after
its extraction depending on the value the G
2
parameter differs from the G
2
value, taking into
account in what way the G
2
value is formed and what
factors influence the parameters of this formation. In
practice, their values can be relative to each other as
G
2
< G
1
; G
2
= G
1
; G
2
> G
1
and each of these options
has its own economic meaning that depends on
specific mining conditions.
It should be noted that G
1
and G
2
characterize
only the ore itself and the ore mass extracted from the
subsoil as raw materials, but they do not consider the
fact that in addition to the difference in value there is
a difference in volume of these materials. These
volumes characterize the scale of mining and between
them there is already a clearer dependence Q
2
=f(Q
1
)
(Mossakovskyi, 2004).
To describe it, one can use the following
indicators: the total value of the industrial ore reserve
G
ir
=Q
1
G
1
that is the one that characterizes its
economic potential; the total value of the iron ore
product G
p
= Q
2
G
2
. In this case, G
p
is a general
economic characteristic of the entire volume of ore
extracted.
To what extent a mining enterprise will be able
to use the potential of G
p
in mining depends on the
following factors:
1. Factors that are determined by objective
conditions and do not depend on the mining
enterprise, namely: geographical conditions of
deposit location (distance, nature of the area,
climate); geological conditions (composition of
rocks, morphology of subsoil, hydrogeological
conditions); geochemical characteristics (chemical
composition of ore, content of useful components and
harmful impurities); mining conditions (subsoil
geomechanics, seismics, physical properties of
rocks); administrative and social conditions
(development of the mining area, population that will
be influenced by production activities of the
enterprise). The same group includes factors of
economic nature according to the economic policy of
Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business
223
the state regarding the use of subsoil and business
activities of mining enterprises (subsoil fees, taxes,
mandatory payments).
These factors determine the amount of funds that
should be invested in production to settle technical,
environmental, social issues that will arise before the
mining enterprise under the specified conditions
because each of them imposes certain restrictions on
mining the ore reserve.
2. Factors that depend on the enterprise, i.e. how
it solves the following tasks:
correct assessment of the potential of the enterprise:
its technical, technological, labour, financial
resources;
rational planning and organization of the
production process (stoping and all preparation
processes for it);
selection and adaptation to specific conditions of
the stoping technology;
selection and efficient use of labour
mechanization and equipment;
motivation of workers to productive and high-
quality work;
provision of production with necessary resources
including the relevant transportation mode and
their efficient use;
organization of control over implementation of
the production process at all its stages;
organization of an appropriate level of analysis
and evaluation of economic efficiency of
production which should provide the most
accurate results.
It is quite difficult to do all this, but without this
it is almost impossible to obtain necessary production
results using the economic potential of the ore reserve
to the full extent and get such profitability of the
business, the value of which will be the maximum
possible in these conditions. In order to properly
assess this completeness, we formalize the process of
mining the ore reserve of the mining block and
obtaining a commercial iron ore product where the
key role is played by stoping.
The relationship between G
ir
and G
p
can be
formalized by the following function
1122
GQKGQGKG
irр
ϕϕ
===
(4)
The coefficient K
φ
in this formula characterizes
the degree of change of the product QtpGvil relative
to the value of the product Q
s
(salary)G
g
(gross), that is
obtained as a result of development. In the case of
different solutions for development will be different
value Q
tp
G
rv
. You can calculate the value of K
φ
as
follows:
11
22
GQ
GQ
K =
ϕ
(5)
Note that this formula for calculating shows
only the final result of ore mining by completeness of
the value use, but it does not reflect the fact that this
result is not instantaneous, but is the result of a long
time of a number of processes (geological
exploration, geological economic evaluation of the
stock, design of development, opening of the stock,
drainage of the extraction site, preparation of the
stock, its cutting, implementation of a set of
technological processes of purification of ore, rolling
of extracted ore mass, its rise to the earth's surface,
processing ore mass at the crushing and sorting plant
products). The implementation of each of these
processes requires the investment of certain financial
resources. The magnitude of these investments
depends on geological, mining, geomechanical,
hydrogeological conditions at each extraction site and
the nature of the decisions on which these processes
will be performed. Therefore, the distribution of these
investments in different processes in different
extractive countries and their total amount will be
different. And, most importantly, will be different and
economic characteristics of the process of ore
extraction and its economic results.
An important aspect is that the financial costs of
all development processes and the distribution of
these costs form certain financial constraints on the
implementation of the removal extraction and its
components of technological processes. This means
that when designing the development of the
production unit stock in specific conditions, not all
options of technological, technical and parametric
solutions can be used, even when they are technically
acceptable, but the financial costs of their
implementation in these conditions will exceed
acceptable limits.
These limitations must be predicted as accurately
as possible during project preparation - because they
are the basis for choosing the best design solutions for
different development conditions.
Industrial ore reserves Q
1
with gross value G
1
,
forms a certain common value G
ir
=Q
1
G
1
. Ideally,
this stock could be sold at a price equal to the value
of this value. However, in the development of each
completed process over the stock, from the above,
and the money invested in it reduces its value for the
mining company, because its sale at the market price
of the metal will no longer be so profitable for each
work performed. If the total value of a certain process
is equal to the amount of money invested in
development, the profitability of such development
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
224
will be equal to R = 0 and formally perform all other
processes will be economically unprofitable.
However, if at a certain level of the process
sequence to optimize solutions for each of them, it is
possible to optimize the entire production process,
including not only reducing the financial costs of each
process, but also their optimal distribution between
different processes. Such optimization can be
performed only with the use of economic and
mathematical modeling of the entire development
process, in which the basis is the modeling of the
cleaning extraction.
The basis for such optimization is this approach.
Based on the expression (5), the calculation of K
φ
by
stages of development can be done as follows
11
1
22
11
1
11
22
GQ
SGQ
GQ
S
GQ
GQ
К
N
i
і
N
i
і
==
==
ϕ
(6)
In this formula the expression ΣS
і
/Q
1
G
1
determines
the specific value of financial investments in
processes in the sequence of their implementation
1, 2, 3,…, і. This is the relationship between the
values Q
2
G
2
і Q
1
G
1
taking into account the financial
costs of receipt Q
2
з Q
1
can be formalized as follows
,
1
44131122
=
+=
N
i
і
SGQGQGQGQ
(7)
Where
Q
3
volume of ore of industrial stock, which is
lost during treatment, thousand tons;
Q
4
the volume of rock that clogs the ore during
removal, thousand tons;
G
4
value contained in the ore mass in the form
of ore material that meets the requirements
for the iron ore product, UAH.
At each stage of development the value K
φ
will
change as the values change Q
2і
, G
2і
, S
і
.
Indicator K
φ
, in the given form we will name the
Indicator of efficiency of use of economic potential
of an industrial stock of ore. This indicator determines
the degree of use of the economic potential of the
stock, which is formed by the value of the ore G
1
і the
volume of its stock Q
1
, G
ir
=Q
1
G
1
upon receipt of an
iron ore product, on any сstages of the production
process.
In turn, the iron ore product at each stage of
development is characterized by total value G
p
=Q
2
G
2
,
which differs from the value G
ir
due to certain losses
of ore and its clogging with empty floors and financial
costs ΣS to carry out development. This changes the
value of the stock to values G
p
as the sequence of
development work.
In this formula, the values of the parameters are
known G
1
,
G
2
they are determined by the content and
price of the metal in the ore of the industrial stock and
in the iron ore product. The value is known ΣS, it is
determined by economic and mathematical modeling
of the development process, or according to practice.
The value is also known Q
1
, it is provided by the
geological service of the enterprise.
Only the value remains uncertain Q
2
. At the stage
of project development for the development of the
production unit stock, it can be determined by the
nature of design decisions for development and based
on the value of the indicator Q
1
, by such expression
()
()
11
2
1
2
100
100
QКQ
k
k
Q
v
=
=
(8)
Where
k
1
the coefficient of industrial stock ore during its
extraction, %;
k
2
the coefficient of clogging of the extracted ore
mass during mining, %;
К
v
the coefficient of visible extraction of ore
during mining, USD
Indicator k
1
represents the ratio of the volume of ore
Q
3
, which was lost during the development of a
certain amount of ore Q
1
, k
1
=100Q
3
/Q
1
, %. Indicator
k
2
- the ratio of the volume of waste rock Q
4
, which is
contained in the extracted ore mass Q
2
, which got into
it in the process of stock development Q
1
,
k
2
=100Q
4
/Q
2
.
Thus, from function (8) formula (6) can be written
as follows.
Taking into account these aspects of the approach
to the economic evaluation of the efficiency of the
removal process that are used in this work in the final
version, this formula is as follows
()
()
321
1
1
2
21
1
100
100
1
KKK
Q
S
k
Gk
G
К
N
i
і
=
=
ϕ
( 9 )
К
1
, К
2
, К
3
coefficients that take into account different
types of taxes К
1
, payments К
2
, repayment of
receivables, etc. from each unit of profit received
from the sale of a unit of iron ore product.
Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business
225
From the expression for determining Kφ it is seen
that in the case of equalization of values
()
()
1
1
2
1
100
100
Q
S
k
Gk
N
i
і
вил
=
=
(10)
the value of this indicator will be equal to 0, where
the ratio ∑S/Q
1
determines the specific financial costs
of development to a certain stage, and the ratio
()
()
,
100
100
2
21
k
Gk
(11)
determines the magnitude of the change in value G
1
taking into account its reduction as a result of
technological losses k
1
and ore clogging k
2
.
Thus from this expression it is possible to predict
at what sizes of parameters k
1
k
2
, Q
1
, S
і
, G
2
development will reach the limit of profitability,
when the income from the sale of products only
compensates for the costs of development without
making a profit.
Therefore, in order to prevent unprofitable
development, it is necessary to determine the limit of
the value of ΣS, which cannot be exceeded when
making design decisions. This limit (limΣS) can be
determined on the basis of the value indicator
()
2
221
1
100
100
lim
k
GQk
S
N
i
і
<
=
(12)
Let us consider how this limitation applies to the
second mining. The amount of financial costs that
forms the value ΣS includes the second mining costs
and is as follows:
,
1413121110
987654321
1
SSSSS
SSSSSSSSSЗ
N
i
i
++++++
+++++++++=
=
(13)
Where
S
1
is the amount of financial costs for geological
prospecting works, UAH;
S
2
is for the construction of a surface system,
UAH;
S
3
is for the stock preparation, UAH;
S
4
is for the stock division, UAH;
S
5
is for the drilling and blasting works, UAH;
S
6
is for the ventilation of the mining space, UAH;
S
7
is for the restoration of dislocated objects,
UAH;
S
8
is for the performance of works on the drawing
of ore mass, UAH;
S
9
is for the delivery of ore mass, UAH;
S
10
is for the ore mass hauling, UAH;
S
11
is for the hoisting of ore mass on the earth's
surface, UAH;
S
12
is the costs for processing of ore mass at the
grinding-sorting factory or the enrichment,
UAH;
S
13
is the financial costs for capital mining
operations (it is calculated as % of the total
amount of weight-to-volume ratio), UAH;
S
14
is the costs, which were not taken into
account at the performance of actual mining
(defined as% of the total amount of weight-
to-volume ratio), UAH;
S
15
is the amount of unaccounted financial costs
(defined as % of the total amount of weight-
to-volume ratio), UAH.
In this formula, the parameters S
6
+S
7
+S
8
+S
9
+S
10
are determined by the financial costs for the process
of second mining of ore З
ios
, and the other ones by
the general mine costs З
gm
Thus, the formula (9) will
appear as:
()
()
.
100
100
1
12
1
1
+
=
Q
SS
k
Gk
G
К
iosgm
вил
ϕ
(14)
Based on the equation (12), the maximum
allowable value З
ios
can be calculated as follows
()
gmios
З
k
GQk
З
<
2
111
100
100
(15)
The obtained ratio allows to determine what
should be the values of all basic technological
features of the process of second mining Q
p
, k
1
, k
2
and
especially S
ios
, which is the part of a series of items of
financial costs for development, in order to ensure the
economic feasibility of its making in each mining unit
in economic conditions of operation of a particular
mining enterprise.
As mentioned above, the limit of the financial
costs for the performance of each of the development
processes is affected not only by the maximum
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
226
allowable value of the prime cost of iron ore products,
but also by the fact of correlation of the values of
financial costs for all development processes. This
determines the opportunities and limitations of
investing in each process. These ratios must be
determined in the project of second mining, for cost-
effective decisions on projects, for these development
conditions, for example, when the financial losses,
outsized due to objective reasons, on one process can
be compensated by certain technological, parametric
solutions of performance of another process, so that
the total costs of its implementation do not exceed the
maximum value lim∑S, and their technical results
were acceptable for the enterprise.
This situation requires the detailed organization
of work throughout the production cycle, taking into
account the relationships and dependencies between
individual processes and works.
All this applies to the technological processes of
second mining, which have a lot of options for
technology, mechanization means, parameterization
and all of them provide different economic results in
the specific conditions.
To implement this approach, it is proposed to use
a number of indexes that reflect the efficiency of the
economic potential of the ore stock in the
implementation of each technological process of
second mining, which are the target optimization
functions of these processes:
min100
11
=
GQ
S
К
d
d
ϕ
(16)
min100
11
=
GQ
S
К
b
b
ϕ
min100
11
=
GQ
S
К
v
v
ϕ
mi
n
100
11
=
GQ
S
К
br
br
ϕ
min100
11
=
GQ
S
К
ot
ot
ϕ
Where
K
φd
is for the drilling works, %;
K
φb
is for the blasting works, %;
K
φv
is for the ventilation, %;
K
φbr
is for the works on ore mass drawing, %;
K
φot
is for the works on delivery of ore mass, %;
The amount of financial costs for implementation,
respectively
S
d
is for the drilling works, UAH;
S
b
is for the blasting works, UAH,
S
v
is for the ventilation, UAH,
S
br
is the work on the drawing of ore mass from
the mining space, UAH,
S
ot
is the work on delivery of ore mass, UAH;
The comparison of the values of these indexes on
their respective groups makes it possible to determine
how effectively each of the components of the second
mining process was implemented, as well as provides
an opportunity to identify the problems in the
distribution of financial costs for their performance.
It should be noted that these indicators in the
complex characterize the efficiency of a single
process of ore stoping. In this case, the values of the
parameters S
d
, S
b
, S
br
, S
ot
substantially different from
each other. Their integral contribution to the use of
the value of industrial ore reserves and evaluation of
the efficiency of its use can be carried out applying
the following formula
mi
n
100
++++
=
пз
зп
валпз
otbrvbd
Q
Q
GQ
SSSSS
К
ϕ
(17)
This expression is the target function of the
stoping process optimization on the entire range of
works that must be performed during its
implementation. Such optimization is performed
through economic and mathematical modeling of the
stoping when considering different options for the
technological and technical competitive solutions for
the implementation of the components of the stoping
processes according to the variational approach to its
design.
The technique described above formed the basis
for computer program, that was developed by the
authors, for modeling of the stoping process,
determining its optimal parameters and evaluating its
economic efficiency.
An example of the results of modeling with this
system is given in Table 1, which presents its results
for one of the mining units at the “Yuvileyna mine of
the Private Joint Stock Company "Sukha Balka of
Kryvyi Rih Iron Ore Basin.
Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business
227
Table 1: Results of economic and mathematical modeling
of the stoping process.
The indicators Marking
Unit of
meas
Value
Reserve Q
1
t 260000,0
The content of
metal
С
m
% 62,0
Gross Value
G
1
UAH / t 50000,0
The total value
Q
1
G
1
UAH / t 8060000000,0
Results of modelling
Losses of ore k
1
% 9,0
Clogging k
2
% 12,0
Ore mass Q
2
t 268863,6
The content of
metal
Cm % 58,0
The total value Q
2
G
2
UAH 7797045454,5
Driling S
6
UAH 87360000,0
Blasting S
7
UAH 145600000,0
Ventilation S
8
UAH 2912000,0
Drawing S
9
UAH 37856000,0
Transportation S
10
UAH 20384000,0
Amount S
io
UAH 294112000,0
The indicators: Kφd % 1,08387
Kφb % 1,80645
Kφv % 0,03613
Kφbr % 0,46968
Kφot % 0,25290
Total % 3,52998
Cost UAH/t 1131,2
The above table shows that relative to the total
value of the industrial ore reserve Q1G1 in this block,
the finantional costs for the stoping is 3.52%. That is,
by this amount there will be an extracted value
decline relative to the stock value in the
implementation of the stoping. At the same time, with
the calculated projections of this process, the
profitability of the mining itself will be quite high
because when the cost of extracted ore mass is
11301.2 UAH / t for the main development process -
stoping, the selling price of iron ore in the current
market conditions of different consumers ranges from
2259.0 to 6213.0 UAH/t, that is 1.99-5.49 times
higher than the production cost according to this
process.
In conclusion, we note that the authors are
currently working on the wider implementation of
this modeling system in the design departments of
iron ore mining companies in Ukraine.
The methodology described above is the basis of
a computer program developed by the authors for the
modeling of the process of second mining,
determination of its optimal parameters and
assessment of the economic efficiency. Currently, the
work is underway to implement it in the project
departments of iron ore mining enterprises in
Ukraine.
3 СONCLUSION AND FURTHER
WORK
As a result of the research on the topic of this
publication, the following conclusions can be made:
1. The iron ore mining industry of Ukraine is one
of the most powerful in the world, producing 90% of
iron ore products. An important direction in its
functioning and development is the use of the
underground method of development of iron ore
deposits. This can be explained by the fact that the
specifics of its technology provides the possibility of
cost-effective mining of iron ore at great depths
(greater than 1000 m), which have the main stock of
these ores in the bowels of Ukraine.
2. All iron ore mining enterprises of Ukraine are
private and part of large business structures. The
conditions in which they currently carry out the
underground development and prospects for its
development raise the problem of accurate and
reliable forecasting of economic results of the
development, because it directly determines the
profitability of the business, its competitiveness in the
iron ore market, and provides reasonable business
planning.
3. Such results can be achieved by ensuring the
cost-effective implementation of the key process of
development, which is the second mining of ore. The
financial costs for its implementation reach 60-70%
of the prime cost of extracted ore mass.
4. To solve this problem, it is necessary to have a
method of modeling and calculating the parameters of
the second mining, which would determine the
optimal solutions for its performance in specific
mining and economic conditions based on accurate
forecasting of economic results, which is currently
missing. The authors have developed the following
methodology and system of technical and economic
indexes, which provide the possibility of multifactor
economic analysis of competitive solutions for the
performance of second mining and selection of the
optimal one.
5. The basis of this methodology and system of
indexes of second mining efficiency is the use of
indexes of the value of ore, the value of its stock and
the degree of use of value as a result of this process
ISC SAI 2022 - V International Scientific Congress SOCIETY OF AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE
228
on the final result of development.
6. This methodology also provides a method of
determining the financial limitations, which function
in specific economic conditions of operation of
mining enterprises, and which determine the amount
of allowable financial costs for the performance of
second mining. This limitation is one of the basic
factors that provide the optimization of the
parameters of the second mining.
7. Based on this methodology, the authors
developed a computer program for modeling and
determining the optimal parameters of the second
mining in the development of iron ore at great depths.
The need for this program is due to the great
complexity of solving the problem of optimization of
mining solutions.
8. Further development of this work will be the
creation of systems for modeling the entire process of
the underground iron ore production, a key element
of which is second mining of ore, as well as the
implementation of this system at mining enterprises
to prepare projects for mining units and determination
of the planning parameters for the process of
development of iron ore deposits and the support of
business planning.
REFERENCES
Kindzerskyi Yu.V. (2013) Industry of Ukraine: strategy and
policy of structural and technological modernization.
NAS of Ukraine, SI Institute for economics and
forecasting. NAS of Ukraine. 536 p.
Kaplenko Yu., Fedko M, and Bezverkhyi S. (2003)
Possibilities of increasing the efficiency of
underground mining and processing of magnetite
quartzites in the Kryvyi Rih basin. Collection of
scientific papers.../National Mining University. -
Dnipropetrovsk, 2003. 17(2): 196-198.
Kaplenko Yu.P. (2003) Prime cost of iron ore: the problem
of reduction as a determining factor of competitiveness.
Metallurgical and mining industry: technology,
economics, machine science, computer science,
ecology, 2: 101-104.
Veduta E.N., Dzhakubova T.N. (2017) Economic science
and economic-mathematical modeli. Mathematical
modeling in economy/ 3-4 (9):23-27.
Ray C., Sina N. (2016) Mine and Mineral Economics.
Prentice hall.
Barry A. (2006) Mineral Processing Technology An
Introduction to the Practical Aspects of Ore Treatment
and Mineral Recovery. Elsevier Science & Technology
Books.
Tradin Ecjnomics. IronOre. https://tradingeconomics.
com/commodity/iron-ore/.
Popov S.O, Ishchenko M.O., Ishchenko L.F., Kolosovskyi
D. (2020) Modelling and design of technological
schemes of underground development of iron ore
deposits at the increase of the dificulty of tecondition
of their funtioning. Resource-saving technologies of
raw-material base development in mineral mining and
processing. Multi-authored monograph. Petroani,
Romania. UNIVERSIT AS Publishing. 467-48 pages.
Martynov, V. and Fedko M. (2010) Calculations of basic
production operations, processes and systems of ore
deposits development, KTU:76 -115
Sazhyn, M., Chibrikov, G. (2001) Subject of labor. In the
book - Economic theoryEdition. NORMA P. 456.
The concept of value (2005) In the book - Menger K.
Collected works. Publishing House “Territory of the
Future”. 496 p.
Mossakovskyi Ya.V. (2004) Economics of the mining
industry. MGGU. 525 p.
Digitalization and Forecasting of the Iron Ore Business
229