Figure 6: Comparison of invoice terminals in different
regions of N company.
It can be seen from Figure 6 that the use
efficiency of invoice terminal of company n is much
lower than that of company Z.
4.2 Conclusion of Cost-effectiveness
Analysis based on DEA Theory
Combined with the DEA analysis and conclusions,
combined with the actual use of the invoice terminal,
the problems with the cost input of the invoice
terminal of the F provincial grid enterprise are as
follows:
1) Lack of standards for terminal launch At
present, there is no unified standard for terminal
release. Terminal release control is extensive.
Business halls declare purchases according to their
needs, and then allocate them to business halls
according to business volume and passenger flow.
There is a large discretionary power and no unified
release standard has been formed. Unified
management and control.
2) The terminal utilization rate is uneven Z
company and N company's invoice terminal use
frequency is uneven, there is a large deviation in
input-output effect, it is necessary to
comprehensively consider factors such as regional
economy, business hall traffic, business volume and
other factors to rationally optimize the number of
terminal inputs.
4.3 Improvement Suggestions
First, the unified and clear terminal delivery
standards. Formulate scientific and reasonable
terminal delivery standards, standardize the source
of funds, conduct unified control over the terminal
demand declaration, and then give delivery after
professional examination and approval, strengthen
lean control, to provide institutional guarantee for
the standardized operation of the terminal.
Second, to establish a terminal regular analysis
mechanism. Strengthen data acquisition, timely and
accurately obtain various business data of terminal
operation through application platform, improve
analysis efficiency, conduct multi-dimensional
comparative analysis of the terminal use efficiency
by collecting data, strengthen closed-loop control,
trace the root cause according to analysis results, and
reasonably allocate idle resources in the region to
ensure the overall use efficiency of the terminal.
Third, optimize the allocation of resources and
utilization efficiency. Comprehensive control the
demand of terminal use, and study measures
according to local conditions to improve the
efficiency of terminal use. Based on the problem of
low use efficiency of terminals in individual
business halls, consider the overall coordination,
allocation and revitalization within the region, so as
to improve the penetration rate and utilization rate of
terminals in the whole region. At the same time, the
promotion of online electronic invoice may bring
negative impact to the business hall terminal,
including whether terminal purchase scientific, cost
economy, reasonable additional input, use
efficiency, etc., it is necessary to analyze the
terminal utilization efficiency, the overall control
around the use of the terminal, provide support for
subsequent decisions.
The fourth is to strengthen the depth of
feasibility study and quality control. Further improve
the depth and quality of the feasibility study. In
response to the insufficient depth of the project
application materials, it is required to analyze and
evaluate the customer groups, main service targets,
type and scale of enterprises, business hall traffic,
business volume and other subdivisions during the
application, and fully demonstrate them. The
necessity, rationality and economy of the terminal
placement plan to avoid over-configuration,
advanced configuration and capital waste.
4.4 Factor Naming
Table 3 shows the factor load matrix after rotation,
the first common factor has a greater load on variable
quick ratio, current ratio, cash ratio, total asset
growth rate, asset liability rate, cost and expense
utilization rate, this shows that these six variables are
highly correlated and fall into one category, which is
called the solvency factor, and the second public
factor, which has a greater load on the Yield valve
and operating profit margin, puts the two variables