regression  model  presents  a  strong  correlation 
between GDP and housing price, the data shows an 
anomaly between the period from 2009 to 2012: GDP 
recovered  but  housing  prices  continuously  fall.  To 
explain  this  abnormality,  the  bubble  of  the  US real 
estate market since the beginning of 21th century and 
the  recession  in  2008.  In  the  article  “The  Great 
American Housing Bubble: Re-Examining Cause and 
Effect”, the author Robert Hardaway concludes that 
“over-extended  homeowners,  greedy  Wall  Street 
financiers  and  investment  bankers,  compromised 
realtors,  accountants,  credit  rating  agencies,  and 
ineffective and inattentive regulators have all played” 
in the housing bubble (Hardaway, 2009). In 2007, the 
subprime mortgage industry collapsed and “At least 
25  subprime  lenders,  which  issue  mortgages  to 
borrowers with poor credit histories, have exited the 
business, declared bankruptcy, announced significant 
losses,  or  put  themselves  up  for  sale.”(Hovanesian, 
2007).  After  the  burst  of  the  housing  bubble,  the 
Great Recession began. Based on the data, the GDP 
obviously recovered in 2009, but the negative effect 
of  Great  Recession  on  the  real  estate  market  still 
existed.  It  is  can  be  considered  as  a  housing  price 
correction  which  means  the  price  gradually  and 
eventually  reaches  the  normal  level.  When  the 
housing price reached a comparatively  low level, it 
raised  again  accompanied  by  booming  GDP. 
Analyzing the recession effect on housing price, we 
may  primarily  conclude  that  housing  price  has  a 
strong  correlation  with  GDP,  but  when  a  housing 
bubble  exists  and  bursts,  the  price  may  not  follow 
with GDP since  the moderation and  recovering  can 
happen at the same time.   
Nonetheless, the rate of home ownership cannot 
predict  the  trend  of  housing  prices  on  its  own. 
According  to  the  linear  regression  model  for  only 
house  ownership  and  housing  price  index,  the  R-
value is only 0.202 and the p-value is 0.378 which is 
not  significant.  A  potential  reason  behind  this  is 
house  ownership  rate  does  not  directly  reflect  the 
actual  demand  and  supply  on  real  estate  market. 
However,  the  multi  regression  model  shows  that 
despite in the housing price correction period, when 
the  GDP  increase,  a  higher  house  ownership  rate 
would lead to a more intensive increase, and a lower 
house ownership rate may indicate a week increase in 
housing price.       
6  CONCLUSIONS 
In the first regression model, we can see that the 
resident  population  is  the  most  important  factor 
affecting  the  housing  price  index,  followed  by  the 
residential  ownership  rate,  followed  by  Gross 
Domestic  Product,  and  finally  the  per  capita 
disposable  income.  Due  to  the  significance  test, 
resident  population  and  per  capita  personal  income 
show  low  significance.  After  modifications,  the 
improved  model  of  how  the  housing  price  index 
relates to GDP and homeownership rate demonstrates 
a  strong  and  significant  correlation.  Based  on  the 
model,  we  can  conclude  that  at  the  situation  of 
economic  growth  (booming  GDP)  and  high  house 
ownership rate (comparatively more residents own a 
house),  the  housing  price  would  continuously 
increase.  However,  during  recession  and  following 
recovery period, the housing price would meet a large 
correction  to  a  balanced  level  even  though  GDP 
increase. Moreover, although this model may help to 
predict  future  housing  price  in  New  York  or  other 
states with a metropolitan, its own limitations should 
be considered. For example, the data is only based on 
recent 20 years, which is a short time interval. Also, 
the recession period from 2007 to 2009 may affect the 
preciseness of the model, since recession is not a high 
probability event and the whole economic situations 
are different  between recessions. More independent 
variables,  such  as  interest  rate,  housing  tax,  and 
unemployment  rate,  should  be  added  in  future 
research to build a model that is more likely to reveal 
the truth.
 
REFERENCES 
Ahmad, N., Taha, R., Endut, W. A., & Baatwah, S. R. A. 
(2021).  The  effects  of  house  price  and  taxation  on 
consumers’  burden:  The  case  of  Malaysia. Kasetsart 
Journal of Social Sciences, 42(2), 281-286. 
Ma,  L.,  Liu,  H.,  &  Sing,  M.  (2021).  Responsiveness  of 
residential  construction-production  progress  to  house 
price  dynamics. International  Journal  of  Housing 
Markets and Analysis. 
Margo, R. A.  (1996). The rental price of housing in New 
York  City,  1830–1860. The  Journal  of  Economic 
History, 56(3), 605-625. 
Valadez, R. M. (2011). The housing bubble and the GDP: 
A correlation perspective. Journal of Case Research in 
Business and Economics, 3, 1. 
Hardaway,  R.  (2009).  "The  Great  American  Housing 
Bubble: Re-Examining Cause  and Effect." University 
of Dayton Law Review 35(1): 33-60. 
Hovanesian, M. D. (2007). "The Mortgage Mess Spread." 
from  https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2007-
03-07/the-mortgage-mess-spreadsbusinesswMeek-
business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice.