discriminatory elements, can be challenged in
international courts, the prospects for recognizing the
very idea of \u200b\u200bsuch a mechanism as
illegitimate do not seem serious. The introduction of
frontier carbon charges is just one manifestation of
the green development of the global economy. In
addition to strengthening national emission reduction
policies (to date, 127 countries have announced plans
to achieve carbon neutrality, including China and the
United States), a growing number of large investment
funds, pension funds, insurance companies and other
institutional investors are indicating plans to divest
assets from coal, oil and even gas projects (Kurbanov,
2008). In the corporate sector, sectoral emission
control and regulation systems are being introduced
(including the Corsia system in international civil
aviation); Globally, there is a rapidly growing number
of companies seeking to reduce their carbon footprint
along the entire value chain in response to growing
climate reporting requirements from investors.
2 MATERIALS AND METHODS
Carbon farming in agribusiness and forestry can also
be a tool to overcome trade barriers for carbon-
intensive exports, including agro-exports.
The EU's plans to introduce a frontier carbon
adjustment mechanism have prompted many
producers of carbon-intensive products exported to
the EU to rethink their carbon strategy. Over the past
few months, it has become clear that the emergence
of such a mechanism in one form or another is
inevitable. Moreover, similar measures can be taken
in the United States: the program of the new president
directly provides for the introduction of a "corrective
carbon levy" in relation to countries "not fulfilling
their obligations on climate and environmental
protection." If this scenario materializes, there is a
high probability of a domino effect triggering:
exporters to these markets will be forced to switch to
higher carbon standards of importing countries, and
therefore protect their producers with similar
measures. Russia's failure to take steps to develop and
implement a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions will mean a gradual narrowing of export
markets. It may turn out that there will simply be
nowhere to switch from the EU market: similar
barriers will be erected in other markets (Sidarenko,
2006). Challenging the “carbon adjustments” in the
World Trade Organization is unlikely to lead to the
desired results: if the specific forms of
implementation of the mechanism can be recognized
as inconsistent with certain WTO rules (for example,
on the prohibition of discrimination), the very idea of
such a mechanism is subject to its support economic
centers of the world, including the EU and the USA,
and the emergence of climate change issues at the
forefront of the international agenda - with a high
probability will be recognized as legitimate.
In addition, the WTO dispute resolution system
remains blocked today (the US is preventing the
appointment of members of the Appellate Body,
citing irregularities in its work; the new
administration has not yet demonstrated a willingness
to change the situation in the foreseeable future), so
filing a complaint in the near future is futile. Thus,
having won a dispute with the EU on energy
adjustments last year, Russia cannot enforce the
decision of the arbitration panel, since the EU filed an
appeal with the non-functioning Appellate Body,
thereby maintaining the status quo indefinitely.
Initiatives to price carbon – whether in the form of a
carbon tax or an emissions trading system – are on the
rise around the world, numbering around 60 to date.
before.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Africa's first carbon tax was introduced in the
Republic of South Africa (SAR), with Singapore
pioneering in Asia. On February 1, 2021, the national
emissions trading system began to operate in China.
In these circumstances, one of the key elements of
Russia's response to climate threats and related trade
barriers could be agriculture and forestry. It is very
likely that in the future, agricultural products will
somehow fall under the EU's corrective mechanism.
Given that the agricultural sector is the subject of
special protection in the EU, there is no reason to
believe that, by protecting competition in its market
with a carbon corrective mechanism, the European
Commission will refuse to use this tool to protect the
European agricultural producer (Gitarsky, 2006).
Moreover, at the international level, an understanding
is beginning to form that, in the issue of climate
change, agricultural production “is not only the
source of the problem, but also a key element of the
solution.” If earlier agriculture was perceived, on the
one hand, as one of the causes of climate change, and
on the other hand, as one of its main victims, and the
question was raised only about reducing the impact of
climate change on agricultural production and its
adaptation to a changing climate, today we are talking
about that agriculture can become a source of
technologies that ensure the removal (sequestration)
of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.