conditional coherence that emphasized that people
from Papua in the city of Yogyakarta should also
respect and respect the existing local community.
around them. Because local people also do the same
thing to people from Papua through an inscription
“Kitorang Jogja Loves Papua”, which was brought by
the Special Secretary of DIY during a peaceful protest
in front of the Vredeburg fort, Yogyakarta.
The inscription "Kitorang Jogja loves Papua"
using red and white roses means that the people of
Yogyakarta always welcome the arrival of their
brothers from Papua. To that extent, it is to respect the
rights and obligations of other members of the
community. The conditional coherence in the quote
above can be seen through the word “so far”. This
word is a link between sentences which is also a
prerequisite for the previous sentence (Yogya
residents always welcome the arrival of brothers from
Papua). In the incident of the persecution of Papuan
students, KR seems to have constructed ethnic
Papuans as a group that must be proactive in creating
a conducive atmosphere. KR's emphasis on Papuan
ethnic groups to play an active role in creating a
conducive atmosphere in Yogyakarta can also be seen
through the news on 20 July 2016: "All parties,
including Papuans living in Yogyakarta, must be
proactive and create a conducive atmosphere."
The use of the phrase “including Papuans” is a
conditional coherence that emphasizes Papuans to be
proactive in creating a conducive atmosphere. Even
the use of the sentence becomes an artifactual form
that directly shows a message to the Papuan people in
particular. In addition, the use of coherence in
constructing reports related to ethnic Papuans is also
widely found in the news about the death of Theys
Eluay. When reporting on Theys eluay's death, KR
used coherence as a form of affirmation of the
existence of Papua which was so "chaotic" because of
Theys' death. The coherence included in their news
articles is conditional coherence which contains two
sentences, where the clause (second sentence) is an
affirmation of the previous sentence: “Several
buildings were damaged and burned, including the
Ratna Hotel, BRI offices and shops. In addition, the
community is still destroying a number of buildings
around Abepura, as well as closing roads.”
If we look at the sentence structure above, we can
see the construction of KR in framing the situation in
Papua which is so tense because of anarchic actions.
The use of the word "other than that" becomes a
liaison to insert a sentence of affirmation or the tense
situation. If KR really wants to present factual
information regarding the tense situation, or anarchic
actions that have occurred in Papua, it is sufficient to
present only the first sentence, without reaffirming
through the second sentence. Conditional coherence
as a form of construction of a tense existence in Papua
can also be seen through the following quote from the
KR article dated 18 November 2001:“Theys
supporters are angry after learning their leader is
dead. Apart from that, angry mobs also blocked and
hurled stones at the highway in Abepura sub-
district.”
The word “other than that” is again used by KR to
construct and emphasize the massive anarchist
actions carried out by the Papuan people. These
actions are even stronger when seen through the
following article excerpts:"Papua's struggle based on
politeness, courtesy, peace and love has become a
door that gets the sympathy of the people and the
government so that there is no violence, but the
struggle stopped until Sunday, because he was found
meningeal in Koya".
The quote from the article above can be seen as a
trigger for Papuan people's frustration over the events
of Theys' death. At the beginning of the sentence
Theys is described as a Papuan son who is very
humanist and loves peace, but this is actually
rewarded by his death. If KR wants to reduce the
tense situation as they appear in several articles when
reporting on the case of Theys' death, KR only needs
to present the first sentence, without including the
second sentence which is connected using the word
“but”. Readers must have known that Theys had died,
and their death became the main news story for KR,
and was placed on the front page. Therefore, the use
of this second sentence is actually very risky in
triggering anarchic actions of the Papuan people.
KR also uses pronouns to legitimize the message
they convey. Pronouns are elements that can be
manipulative forms of language. When expressing the
attitude or position of a person/media in a discourse,
the media can use the pronouns "I" or "we". The use
of the pronoun "I" or "we" refers to the attitude of the
media or journalists in a clear/specific manner. The
use of the pronoun "we" makes this attitude a
representation of a shared attitude in an imaginative
community (Smith, 1992: 250). The use of these
pronouns can be seen through the following article
excerpts: "We want to be really serious, because this
concerns Papua, but we don't want to assume, we
want to be professional. Whoever does this, we will
take action. this is the debt of law enforcement.”
Several times the word “we” is used in the quote
above, which represents an effort to foster solidarity
and embrace the readers, as well as to muffle the
voices of the opposition. In this position the use of the
pronoun "we" also becomes legitimacy for the state
(police). The use of pronouns can also be seen
through the case of the persecution of the Papuan
kamasan dormitories: “We chose roses because roses
are synonymous with expressions of love. Why is red
and white, we hope that in the future Papuans will
remain under the red and white banner”