Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on 
September  25,  2015,  “Transforming  our  world:  the 
2030 sustainable development agenda.” The strategic 
aspects of sustainable development in the relationship 
between  ecology  and  the  economy  in  the  modern 
world are clearly shown in Figure 1. 
 
Figure 1: Structural aspects of sustainable development in 
the modern world. 
In recent years, the category of "green" economy 
has  been  added  to  the  general  context  of  the 
sustainable development of civilization as a direction 
in economic science based on the recognition of the 
economy as a dependent structural component of the 
natural  environment.  The  actual  application  of  this 
concept  in  practice  requires  the  adoption  of 
comprehensive  organizational,  managerial,  legal, 
technological,  financial  and  economic  measures  to 
green  the  economy  and  reduce  its  pressure  on  the 
environment.  The  solution  of  this  problem  can  be 
achieved primarily at the micro level by ensuring the 
sustainable  development  of  individual  enterprises 
(Kalner, 2019). 
The  term  "green"  economy  was  borrowed  from 
the report of the same name by British economists in 
1989,  while  the  start  of  the  formulation  of  the 
corresponding  policy  dates  back  20  years  later  and 
coincides with the global crisis of 2008. It was within 
the  framework  of  overcoming  this  crisis  that  the 
concept  of  a  “green”  economy  was  finalized  and 
approved at the level of the G7 (G7) and G20 (G20) 
summits. 
Since far from the last cause of the crisis was the 
exhaustion  of  the  meanings  of  economic 
development, since individual material consumption 
ceased to be its  engine, the global economy needed 
legitimate grounds for investing in some alternative. 
The "green" economy was chosen for the role of such, 
especially since the state became the main investor in 
the  new  post-crisis  reality,  supporting  the  economy 
with its investments. 
As international environmental studies show, over 
the  past  50  years,  humanity  has  been  steadily 
widening  the  gap  between  the  demand  for 
environmental resources and the  ability of nature to 
satisfy it. At the same time, developed countries leave 
the  largest  “ecological  footprint”,  demonstrating  a 
high  level  of  consumption  of  resources  and  end 
products.  At  the  same  time,  the  level  of  negative 
anthropological  burden  is  always  parabolically 
dependent  on  progressive  economic  growth:  at  the 
initial  stages,  the  acceleration  of  economic 
development  entails  a  deterioration  in  the 
environmental situation, but after key needs are met, 
a public demand for a favorable environment arises, 
provided  through  environmental  measures  and 
prohibitions. 
In  the  broad  sense  of  the  word,  the  "green" 
economy is a direction in economic science based on 
the  recognition  of  the  economy  as  a  dependent 
structural component of the natural environment. The 
adoption  of  this  paradigm  requires  the  adoption  of 
comprehensive  organizational,  managerial,  legal, 
technological,  financial  and  economic  measures  to 
green  the  economy  and  reduce  its  pressure  on  the 
environment. 
It should be noted that in the scientific community 
there  is  no  unified  approach  to  interpreting  the 
essence  of  the  "green"  economy.  There  are  two 
discourses  in  its  definition.  One  of  the  approaches 
emphasizes its evolutionary-technological nature as a 
fundamental principle, while the second approach has 
a social basis and appeals to the idea of justice. 
The representative of the first of these approaches 
can be called the German economist R. Fuchs,  who 
believed that the "green" economy "is characterized 
by a productive synthesis of biological evolution and 
technology, growth along with nature" (Fuks, 2016). 
Russian researcher Yashalova N.N. characterizes the 
"green" economy as an economic system
 "with low 
carbon  emissions,  which  efficiently  uses  resources 
and  meets  the  interests  of  the  whole  society" 
(Yashalova,  2019).  Thus,  within  the  framework  of 
this  discourse,  it  is  implied  that  economic  growth 
opposes the conservation of biodiversity, and the way 
out  of  the  dilemma  and  the  criterion  for  action  is 
precisely the “green” economy.