Figure 2: Pros and cons of introducing a carbon tax.
Taxes allow industries to find the most cost-
effective ways to reduce carbon emissions. This is a
better alternative to a market economy than
government regulation. The carbon tax also
contributes to economic growth. For example, the
carbon tax in Sweden has reduced emissions by 26%
over the past 27 years. During the same period, its
economy grew by 78% (Kanunnikova, 2021).
However, the disadvantages of introducing a
carbon tax should also be disclosed. As noted above,
the carbon tax is regressive, and when gasoline and
gas prices rise, these high percentages will become a
heavy burden for the population who will not be able
to switch to "Green Technologies", that is, everyday
things will become inaccessible to them. Based on
this, it is necessary to introduce a carbon tax gradually
so that people get used to the fact that prices will only
rise and look for alternative options.
The European Union also announced the
"European Green Course", which aims to create a
climate–neutral EU economy by 2050. As one of the
measures, it is planned to introduce a carbon tax on
imports to EU countries. If everything is implemented
according to the plan, importers will have to buy
carbon certificates corresponding to the carbon price
that would be paid in the EU if the goods were
produced locally. The EU has proposed to introduce
a tax on imported carbon-intensive products, which
will determine the role of trade in the fight against
climate change (The EU introduces a carbon tax.
What is its essence and how it works: Ecology News.
https://finance.rambler.ru/). These measures are
causing controversy among EU trading partners,
some of whom consider it "green protectionism". At
best, the proposed carbon tax should promote a
common understanding of carbon-based trade
policies, maximizing both environmental and
economic benefits (Kamilova).
Reducing carbon emissions into the atmosphere is
a global trend, not just a whim of the European Union.
For example, China, Japan and South Korea declare
carbon neutrality as a national goal (Burko, 2013). As
emission control practices are implemented in
different countries, the establishment of cross-border
regulations will become more likely.
In order for exporting countries to survive in the
"green" market, it will be necessary to create their
own state system of accounting and evaluation of
carbon gas, develop tariffs, as well as a system of
incentives for enterprises that have abandoned the use
of carbon gas, thereby minimizing possible climate
damage (Kanunnikova, 2021). Only in this case,
when the state responds promptly to rapidly growing
changes in all areas of the world market, it will be
possible to maintain the competitiveness of the
country, as well as ensure sustainable development.
4 CONCLUSIONS
The essence and importance of the "Green" economy
lies in the fact that it contributes to a more sustainable
and low-carbon economy. In order to stimulate this
area, it is necessary to constantly look for
mechanisms and tools, one of which is the carbon tax.
The introduction of a carbon tax has both
advantages and disadvantages.
The Russian economy is not ready for such
structural shifts as the introduction of a carbon tax, as
it will have to revise all directions, starting with the
regulatory and legislative framework.
However, it cannot fail to react to the changes
taking place around the world, since the cross-border
tax introduced in the EU countries will primarily
negatively affect the Russian economy and its
competitiveness.
REFERENCES
Sleptsova, E.V., Glubokaya, Ya. Ya., 2021. Analysis of the
experience of using financial instruments to stimulate
"green" technologies. Economics and Business: theory
and practice. 4-2.
Kanunnikova, K. I., 2021. Formation of a "green" economy
in Russia. Skif. 5 (57).
Positive:
•Added value reduces
emissions,
motivating
consumers to seek
cleaner energy;
•Accelerates
economic growth
due to a significant
increase in
government
revenues;
•Funds of agencies
managing the effects
of climate change
are increasing.
Negative:
•The carbon tax is
regressive;
•Its sudden increase
shocks the economy;
•Punishes those who
cannot switch to
alternative forms of
energy. Often these
are city-forming
enterprises.