Pes Planus Plantaris (Flat Foot) Decreases Postural Stability of
Basketball Student-athletes through Ground Reaction Force Vector
(vGRF)
Def Primal
1,* a
, Sasanty Kusumaningtyas
2
and Ermita I. Ibrahim
3
1
Universitas Perintis Indonesia, Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Padang, Indonesia
2
Universitas Indonesia, Department of Anatomy, Jakarta, Indonesia
3
Universitas Indonesia, Department of Physiology, Jakarta, Indonesia
Keywords Pes Planus Plantaris, Flatfoot, Ground Reaction Force, Static and Dynamic Stability.
Abstract: Purpose: The main objective of this study is to determine the pes planus plantaris condition can contribute
to the disturbance of postural stability on basketball athlete's in static and dynamics activities.
Methods: This cross-sectional quantitative analytical retrospective study on 47 subjects of basketball
student-athletes were identified the foot arch index by footprint extensive area, and AMTI Force flat-form
(force plate) were determined their postural stability. Subjects were conducted in three activities (static,
dynamic vertical jump, and dynamic loading response) for GRF resultant force vectors towards the vertical
plane of body mass (W).
Results: Analytical result obtained 80.9% of subjects had pes planus plantaris. It shows no significant
differences in pes planus plantaris incidence in both sexes subject (p>0.005), however, there are differences
in athlete’s exercise period aspect. Athlete students who have practiced strictly more than 4 years
experienced over 50% for pes planus plantaris, furthermore, long period exercise were believed stimulating
pes planus. The average value of GRF forces vectors of pes planus plantaris subjects on three different
basketball movements shows a significant correlation to postural stability.
Conclusions: Pes planus plantaris affected almost basketball athlete regarding the length and intensity of
exercise performed. The condition significantly contribute to postural stability disturbance on a static
condition, dynamic vertical jump, and dynamic vertical jump loading response.
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3553-6804
1 INTRODUCTION
Pes planus and pes cavus are leg disorder or lower
extremities abnormalities caused by several factors
such as standing in a long period, bone disorders and
neurological trauma, non-ergonomic shoes, weakness
in ligamentum plantaris, and plantar pedis disorders
related to constituent problems of foot imbalance
(Aydog S. T., et al., 2004; Chuckpaiwong, et al.,
2008; Handrigan, et al., 2012; Sung, P. S., et al.,
2017). Pes planus plantaris (flatfoot) condition
resulting from the occurrence of depression in arcus
longitudinalis medialis (medial longitudinal arch) can
be risk factors of injury in foot overload locomotors
(overuse), and the disruption of tissue trauma in
plantar pedis from persistent weight-bearing
continuously (Boerum V., et al. 2003;
Sung, Paul S.,
2016). Pes planus plantaris is a common occurrence
that often occurs in the sports community, and the
incidence percentage up to 78%. A person with pes
planus plantaris increases forces and energy
consumption while mobilization and higher plantar
pressure during activity (McCormack, et al., 2001;
Sung, Paul S., 2016). Foot arch as contact structure
during body weight-bearing and mobilization can be
suppressed while excessive weight-bearing activities
which lead to lower extremities injury, metatarsals
stress fractures, cuboid syndrome, iliotibial band
syndrome, ligamentum calcaneo-navicularis tear, as
well as plantar pedis compiler structure stresses. It
also related to pathological condition, i.e, diabetes
mellitus that can decrease the quality of tendons
regenerations (Aydog, S T., 2005; Borton, et al.,
Primal, D., Kusumaningtyas, S. and Ibrahim, E.
Pes Planus Plantaris (Flat Foot) Decreases Postural Stability of Basketball Student-athletes through Ground Reaction Force Vector (vGRF).
DOI: 10.5220/0011573500003321
In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support (icSPORTS 2022), pages 143-151
ISBN: 978-989-758-610-1; ISSN: 2184-3201
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
143
1997; Chuckpaiwong, et al., 2008; Colo’, G., et al.,
2021; Mazerolle and Stephanie M., 2007; Ahriyasna,
R., et al., 2021).
Basketball as a weight-bearing sport have high
intermittent intensity movement involving jumping
and landing continuously, acceleration, deceleration,
turning, dribbling, shooting, jump shot, jump fake,
pull-ups jumpers, pivoting and some interspersed with
low slow movement intensity (Bressel E., et al., 2007;
Kong, et al., 2015). Jump shot, pull-up jump and jump
fake in basketball are such jumping movement with
strong foot pushing vertically in both parallel feet on
the side of the body. Vertical jump loading response
(slam dunk and set shoot) is carried out with running
and suddenly jumping (weight-bearing loading
response) which provides bigger bodyweight pressure
in forefoot and midfoot (Kong, et al., 2015; McKeag
and Douglas, 2003; Richie and Douglas H., 2007).
The main issue on basketball athlete plantar pedis is
the presence of malformations and injuries due to
overuse (excessive usage) on the important intrinsic
factors in the foot, such as bone, muscle, tendon, and
ligament (Chuckpaiwong, et al., 2008; Clifford,
Amanda Marie, and Heather Holder-Powell, 2010).
Plantar foot pressure and muscles loading forces
during static, walking, and running performances are
influenced by foot arch type, especially to flatfoot
condition (Koshino, Y., et al., 2020; Sung, P. S., et al.,
2017). Biomechanics processes in basketball athletes
activities involve running and jumping with fairly
high level, high to low intensity, repeated sudden
continuous movement on the foot’s muscles and
ligaments (Aydog S. T., et al., 2004). Running and
jumping during basketball game directly affect the
postural stability especially in jumping to landing
initiation on body fulcrum. The decline of arch
curvature is greater in athletes because of body weight
load for 3-6 times, especially in jumping activity
(Wikstrom, Erik A., et al., 2008). Control of balance
is an essential component of human mobility. In some
studies, the structure of the foot arch contributes
greatly to postural stability in controlling balance.
Melzer et. al concluded that higher ground reaction
force (GRF) would decrease postural stability (Aydog
S. T., et al., 2004; McCormack, Anne P, et al., 2001).
These occur because the energy transfer from heel to
toe is not through the medial bearing on the forefoot,
which relates to rapid high pressure on hallux, and the
2
nd
and 3
rd
metatarsal (Han, et al., 2011). To analyzing
the instability while jumping, the GRF vector is a
perfect predictor (Mazerolle, Stephanie M., 2007).
The results of this study aim to reduce the resultant
amount of GRF to obtain a stable, stronger, and
smoother movement. GRF vector analysis was
conducted if sexes and longer exercise periods
affected the incidence of pes planus. These vectors
will also predict the athlete’s postural stability with
varied arch index.
2 METHODS
This study was a cross-sectional quantitative
analytical at the Department of Anatomy, Faculty of
Medicine, Universitas Indonesia. The force plate was
explored as stability analysis in Somatokinetic
Laboratory in Sports Science Faculty, Universitas
Negeri Jakarta (UNJ). We conducted this research
from November 2016 to April 2017. Samples are
subjects whom basketball student-athletes in the
Faculty of Sport Sciences UNJ for 47 consisting of 29
females in the female's basketball club and 18 males
in the male's basketball club. They had been acceded
written informed consent and approved from the
health research ethical committee of Medical Faculty
of Universitas Indonesia. Foremost, subjects were
screened based on the physical examination criteria,
i.e.; training period at least 6 months with exercise
frequencies 2 times/week minimally, normal BMI, no
abnormalities in the musculoskeletal system of a
lower limb, no pain or disorder experienced in the
trunk and extremities, no diagnosed neurological
disorders, and without under medical treatment.
Examination of pes planus’ Footprint
Angle ruler goniometer), stamp ink, and footprint
diagram paper were served tools to measure athletes’
arch index on subjects’ plantar pedis (fore-foot,
mid-foot, hind-foot) related to arch index
formulation by Canavagn and McCrory
(1997).
Figure 1: Overview of footprint distribution to calculate
subjects arch index (AI) (McCrory, et al., 1997).
We created our footprint stamp pad to maintain the
clearance and cleanliness of footprint images
generated. Student-athletes would be stepped on
those footprint pads to get colored plantar pedis.
Further, footprint images were created on footprint
diagram paper which we could calculated spacious
printed area to be separated subjects arch index then.
icSPORTS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
144
AMTI (Advanced Mechanical Technology Inc.)
Accupower Force Flatform Posturography
(Force Plate)
This computerized based tool generates the body’s
forces direction vector to determine the amount of
GRF vector angle θ against the vertical plane of W
with a goniometer device. The examination was
executed on basketball student-athletes postures
without interrupting their regular exercise schedule
and match preparation to avoid injury and fatigue.
Examination of static (single-leg standing on
dominant leg with contralateral leg flexed
approximately 90 degrees) and dynamics postural
stability (vertical jump and vertical Jump loading
response) was performed for 2 minutes each task
(Borton, David C., et al., 1997). The subjects were
instructed to generate three activities on task
performance with their eyes open. We calculated
student-athletes GRF vectors while they were
foothold on AMTI force plate devices by single-leg
standing (on dominant feet), vertical jump, and
vertical jump loading response conditions. We
analyzed forces resultants using a standardized
formula from angles created between vectors streak
and W direction (Figure 3).
Forces Analysis in Securing Postural Stability
Status
Analysis of subject’s distribution with pes planus
and normal arch measured by univariate chi-square
statistic. The incidence of foot curvature in both
sexes and exercise length period had been calculated
during a similar analysis. We analyzed the effect of
pes planus and normal arch in different gender and
duration of exercise towards postural stability
examined using independent t-test. Statistic analysis
directly carried on the effect of each activity of
static, dynamic vertical jump, and dynamic vertical
jump loading responses. The GRF vector according
to body weight (W) formulated in (Headon, Robert,
and Rupert Curwen, 2001; Hong, et al., 2016):
𝑮𝑹𝑭𝒗 =
𝒎 . 𝒈
𝐜𝐨𝐬 𝜽
The result of forces resultant for GRF vector
accumulated in: 𝑭
=
−𝑾
+𝑮𝑹𝑭
Higher force resultant formed on GRF compared to
the bodyweight force, postural stability will decrease
(Headon, Robert, and Rupert Curwen, 2001; Hong,
et al., 2016). To sum up, we applied the resultant
forces of GRF generated to specify our subject's
postural stability.
3 RESULTS
3.1 Characteristics of Research
Subjects
Basketball student-athletes (n=47) were active
student-athletes in the age of 19.38±1.51 deviation
standard. Initial anamnesis involved 18 male
students for 19.17±1.38 and 29 female students for
19.48±1.6. Participating subjects have a normal BMI
for 21.32±1.4. Student’s exercise program runs for 6
days/week, for 120-180 minutes with a 15-30 minute
break period. It performed during 18-22 weeks (±5
months) in each semester. We performed the
incidence of different foot arch related to genders. It
shows a higher percentage of pes planus incidence 4
times than normal arch students. However, it
revealed no significant differentiation in pes planus
distribution on both sexes of the subject with p-
value=0.449 (table 1).
3.2 Footprint Results
Figure 2: Pes planus (A) and normal arch (B) of basketball
student-athletes in UNJ.
Table 1: Foot arch distribution of basketball student-
athletes for both sexes.
Variables
Foot arch
P-value
Pes planus Normal
Men 16 (88.9%) 2 (11.1%)
0.449
Women 22 (75.9%) 7 (24.1%)
Frequencies 38 (80.9%) 9 (19.1%)
When we have seen the proportion of pes planus
subjects, it was found that longer practice performed
will lead to an increased incidence of pes planus. It
was then proven by statistical correlation analysis
with a significant value of 0.008 (table 2).
A
B
Pes Planus Plantaris (Flat Foot) Decreases Postural Stability of Basketball Student-athletes through Ground Reaction Force Vector (vGRF)
145
Table 2: Basketball student-athletes foot arch index related to exercise length period.
Variables
Index of the foot arch
Total
Pes planus Normal arch
Duration of
exercise (years)
0-4 amount 2 3 5
% Exercise len
g
th 40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
5-8 amount 30 3 33
% Exercise len
g
th 90.9% 9.1% 100.0%
9-12 amount 3 3 6
% Exercise len
g
th 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
13-16 amount 3 0 3
% Exercise length 100.0% .0% 100.0%
Value D
f
A
s
y
m
p
.Si
g
.
(
2-
s
ided
)
Pearson Chi-Square 11,945
a
3 .008
ikelihood Ratio 10.753 3 .013
3.3 Postural Stability on Pes Planus
Plantaris and Normal Arch
Figure 3: GRF force vector illustration in subjects with normal foot arch (A, B, C) and on pes planus plantaris (D, E, F).
3.4 Correlations of Pes Planus and
Normal Arch to Static Postural
Stability
Table 3: Distribution of static postural stability on pes
planus and normal arch basketball student-athletes.
AI N Mean
Std.
Deviation
P-
value
GRF on
static
Pes planus 38 1.6 632 1.8 4397 .043
Normal 9 0.3667 0 .32016
It results in a correlation between the resultant force
on GRF magnitude towards subjects postural
stability in both two types of foot arch with a
significant value of 0.043 (table 3).
3.5 Correlations of Pes Planus and
Normal Arch for the Vertical
Motion (Vertical Jump & Vertical
Jump Loading Response/ Shooting
Position) to Dynamic Postural
Stability
Based on the table 4, statistical results with p>0.05
of GRF resultant force magnitude correlated to the
foot arch type. It indicates that there is a correlation
between the subject postural stability with pes
E
F
C
D
A
B
icSPORTS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
146
Table 4: Distribution of dynamic postural stability with vertical jump and vertical jump loading response on pes planus and
normal arch basketball student-athletes.
AI
N
M
ean Std. Deviation
P
-value
GRF on dynamic vertical
jump
Pes planus 38 15. 2632 8. 82773 .017
Normal 9 7. 8778 2. 23874
GRF vector dynamic loading
vertical jump response
Pes planus 38 30. 9605 15. 21940 .017
Normal 9 17. 9889 6. 50009
planus conditions while performing dynamic
vertical jump activity. A GRF resultant force vector
in vertical jump loading response activity shows the
greater average value on the subject with pes planus
than normal arch subjects. Statistical analysis on
both pes planus and normal foot arch showed
significant association to subject postural stability
with 0.017.
4 DISCUSSION
4.1 Subject’ Characteristics
The subjects had experienced varied pain in the
plantar pedis such as pain in the ankle, heel, knee, or
spine years ago. We believed those findings are
consistent with McKeag's (2003) study which states
that the highest incidence of lower extremity injuries
in basketball athletes, onwards followed by
vertebrae, costae, and upper extremity injuries. The
higher injuries incidence was recorded as strains,
sprains, and lacerations in foot tissues. Our data
disclosed college-level athletes have a higher level
of injury in lower extremities rather than high school
athletes, or basketball athletes as recreational
purposes (McKeag, Douglas, 2003). Distribution of
subjects with normal body mass index (BMI) aims
to avoid any disturbance of stability due to obesity.
As McGraw et al. (2000) study revealed that
postural instability in subjects with obesity indicated
by the displacement vector of energy consumption
compared to subjects without obesity, we keep off
concluding abnormal BMI in our research samples
to reach significant findings.
Commonly known, postural stability is also
affected by the coordination of the brain in the
somatosensory system (visual, vestibular,
proprioceptive) and motoric (musculoskeletal, joint,
soft tissue). In our study, we obtained physical
examination to avoid the influence of both system
works towards postural stability. Physical
examination included personal identity, body
weight, height, health problems diagnosis history in
lower extremities, and training period.
Musculoskeletal system and sensory-motor
inspection cover abnormalities are being felt,
symmetrical differentiation on both extremities,
swelling, pain, gait pattern, muscle tone and
strength, motion agility, and lower extremities
reflexes. Those examinations revealed our involved
research subjects.
4.2 Basketball Student-athletes
Footprint
In our investigation, we examined the basketball
student-athletes arch index by calculating their
spacious footprint area on footprint paper
(millimeter block). These measurements correspond
to the arch index threshold from Cavanagh et al
(1997), which is a more accurate predictor of indices
types of the foot arch, and it has significant rates
closer to the digital scanner footprint (Razeghi,
Mohsen, and Mark Edward Batt, 2002). Arch index
results obtained footprint of 80.9% subject had pes
planus, while the rest of it has a normal arch,
meanwhile, athletes with high foot arches (pes
cavus) are naught. A quote from Borton (1997) and
Anzai et al. (2014) findings, the incidence of pes
planus in athletes has been widely reported and
causing multifactorial problems (bone disorders,
musculoskeletal, and constituent structures
disorders, heavy physical activity, obesity,
developmental settled pes planus).
Pes planus (fallen arch), or also called flatfoot,
planovalgus, or calcaneo-valgus, is a human
underlying of decreasing in the medial longitudinal
arch of the foot and arch deformity due to changes in
the forefoot, mid-foot, and hind-foot area, both
Pes Planus Plantaris (Flat Foot) Decreases Postural Stability of Basketball Student-athletes through Ground Reaction Force Vector (vGRF)
147
starting with symptoms or asymptomatic (Boerum
V., et al., 2003; McCormack, Anne P., et al., 2001;
Sung, Paul S., 2016). The common pes planus
incident factor on sportsmen generally starts from
decrease or loss of function in musculus tibialis
posterior as well as injury (tear) in its tendon,
frequently on arch support tissues, both on the
plantar fascia and ligament composer (Borton, et al.
1997; Yuji Ohta and Emi Anzai, 2014). With the
highest pes planus incident in UNJ basketball
student-athletes, we believe that professional
basketball student-athletes do not realize that they
have an abnormal arch height throughout their
exercise period. Pes planus is still regarded as a
form of change in basketball athletes which no
students effort and intervention in maintaining or
rehabilitating their normal arch. Based on our
investigations on pes planus incidence, we
discovered student-athletes were been wearing flat
soles shoes during exercise and do not even care and
realize serious problems (generally pain sensation)
on their plantar pedis. They assumed that can be
tolerated and will recover soon because it still within
the tolerance limits that would not interfere along
with exercise activities.
4.3 Frequency and Exercise Duration
of Basketball on Pes Planus
Plantaris
In Van Boerum et al (2003) research, foot
dysfunction will deliver the decreasing function of
legs normal structural support. The imbalance in
forces along with activities and movements, heavy
intensity and repetitive activities, weight gain, and
plantar compiler structure weakness, would
potentially decrease the level of foot arch curvature,
and eventually be flattering the arcus longitudinal
medialis (Boerum V., et al., 2003). From a
basketball student-athletes long period exercise that
we revealed, we discovered an increasing incidence
of pes planus. Analysis indicates the arch index in
four (4) years of practice, pes planus incidence will
elevate periodically. Increasing incidence of pes
planus on basketball student-athletes related to the
length of steps while they are doing intensive
exercise. In contrast to the results of Aydog (2004)
findings, it is a negative correlation between the
incidence of pes planus in adolescent basketball
player and non-basketball player on 0.497 and 0.890
significancies (Aydog S. T., 2004). However, what
we discover, exercise length period contributed to
the incidence of pes planus. We believe that pes
planus high percentage incident officially influenced
by the exercise intensity and duration taken, indeed
before and during their education in the UNJ
basketball club. Aydog research (2004) analyzed
basketball players on 1-7 years exercise duration
followed by 8 hours/week exercise intensity,
whereas in our research, subjects performed 1-16
years exercise with 12-16 hours/week. With longer
exercise intensity and intensive frequencies every
single week, we believed it would give chances of
delivering direct injuries due to the over-use of
constituent tissues in the foot arch. What we
convinced similar to Volkof and Klingele research in
Aydog (2004) which regular intensive exercise and
increasing prolonged exercise intensity will result in
flatfoot (pes planus) incidence over running
activities during playing basketball.
Another our finding, student-athletes bodyweight
loading during exercise is concentrated in the
plantar pedis forefoot region. The imposition of
body weight (weight-bearing) for a long time is
often found in student-athletes while running and
making leaps during exercise. We believed high-
pressure forces in the forefoot will lead to stronger
and continuous stretch in the plantar fascia and
posterior tibial tendon. Over-use pulling and
stretching conditions will increase the incidence of
tissue injury or rupture in plantar pedis arch-
supporting tissue. The pain had been experienced by
the entire subject (100%) at plantar fascia, and some
pain in the ankle, heel, and knee. In the end, the
injuries cause weakness of the arch structure and
finally decrease the plantar arch curvature.
4.4 Postural Stability of Basketball
Student-athletes
What we investigated, student-athletes postural
stability measured in three common basketball
activities; standing on a single leg, vertical jump
(jump shot, pull-up jumper or fake jump), and
vertical jump loading response (shooting, slam dunk,
or set shoot). It showed the incidence of pes planus
on basketball student-athletes postural stability
determined instability values. Postural stability
prescribed the extent of instability on student-
athletes from various activities. As far as we noticed,
postural stability in basketball athletes with pes
planus never been assessed in certain activities,
where some basketball studies specifically analyzed
postural stability in static conditions. Talking about
ground reaction forces examined, Headon (2001)
had examined the pressure on the floor for observing
vertical components on GRF used in classifying
movement. He provided details for implementing
icSPORTS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
148
movement initiating systems using vertical
components on GRF. Similar to Headon's, we
calculated forces quantity on the subject’s GRF
resultant towards the vertical force component
(Headon, Robert, and Rupert Curwen, 2001). The
magnitude of each force vector created can not be
illustrated by the force plate examination imaging
that appeared. The data for stability examination was
only a vector force line formed on reaction force by
research subjects loading action. GRF vector
contained in fx, fy, and fz quadrants and only
measured force vector angles magnitude to the
vertical plane (fy). So, it can be determined the
amount of GRF force in subject’s loading activities
(Önell, Annica, 2000).
Hong (2016) explained, since force plate is a
GRF measurement, some studies have utilized force
plate as GRF examinations verification on postural
stability. Hong revealed there was a significant
association on the standard deviation of vertical
vector component (vGRF) to postural stability
review during sitting, standing, and position change.
One empirically previously mentioned that people
with younger age have a greater GRF variability
than older ages with a single leg standing
examination (Hong, et al., 2016). For example, when
body bending movement (shifting pivot center
towards their body mass), there will be a decreasing
acceleration which leads to reduce GRF.
Furthermore, when the body does jump motion
(moving CoM away from the fulcrum), it will
require additional acceleration and acting force on
the fulcrum (Headon, Robert, and Rupert Curwen,
2001). With the occurrence of changes in GRF, it
affects the normalization of vertical force which
further affects the body’s stability. When the force
required to normalize the GRF vector is bigger,
postural stability will decrease.
With different tracking areas in subjects on both
arch indexes, we believe that flatter arch curvature,
especially in athletes, will reduce postural stability
in every activity conducted, both static and dynamic.
Similar in Bressel et al (2007) findings, basketball
athletes have static and dynamic stability problems
rather than in gymnastics and soccer athletes,
however, their stability is still impaired in overall
athletes than non-athletes subjects. What we
analyzed consistent with Kulthanan's (2004)
research, different footprint parameter for national
and non-national athletes was different from non-
athletes. What we believed, fifth metatarsal and long
flat index space in athletes was greater than non-
athletes subjects. Correspondingly, Bressel et al
(2007) claimed that athletes have no interruption at
postural stability compared to non-athletes.
4.5 Relations Pes Planus Plantaris on
Static Activity in Basketball
Student-athletes
From the examination results of two arch types in
static postural stability, it revealed association value
(p<0.05). It explains that the pes planus subject
experienced decreasing postural stability which
leads to the unstable conditions of GRF resultant
toward the body’s vertical plane. Postural stability
by calculating GRF forces on static condition have a
similar tendency with Onell (2000) research. Onell
revealed although the magnitude of vertical force
could be compared, the vertical force component
simultaneously similar to normal and healthy
subjects after stroke (CVA - cerebral vascular
accident). In Sung (2017) study, flatfoot group had
no significant correlation in decreasing of kinetic
stability without visual input, however, it correlated
to visual input performed. On the other hand, Colo
study in 2020 agreed to what we revealed that
postural stability decreased significantly in the
flatfoot group even the muscles activation onset
during the transition task of double-to single leg
stance did not differ significantly (Koshino, Y., et
al., 2020; Sung, P. S., et al., 2017). Ultimately, there
was the presence of a slight difference between the
GRF to W in subjects in both arch indexes. Finally,
flatfoot condition certainly will affect the subject’s
postural stability. Because a greater amount of force
is required to normalize the W vector, postural
stability decrease directly.
4.6 Relations of Pes Planus Plantaris on
the Dynamic Activity on a Vertical
Jump and Vertical Jump Loading
Response in Basketball
Student-athletes
Assessment of postural stability observed in both
dynamic motions revealed similar results as static
measurement. It showed decreasing postural stability
on student-athletes with pes planus compared to the
normal arch foot. Sato (2006) studied has noted that
dynamic motion analysis in running biomechanics
with force plate can determine the direction and
magnitude of vGRF. This study indicates that the
occurrence of postural instability is caused by the
subject’s injury experienced in the lower extremities.
Sato says that it will lead to abnormal conditions of
Pes Planus Plantaris (Flat Foot) Decreases Postural Stability of Basketball Student-athletes through Ground Reaction Force Vector (vGRF)
149
an anatomical structure in the lower limb plantar
structure, namely pes planus. Anatomical
abnormalities in plantar pedis structure due to force
and pressure that deliver while initial contactor upon
push-off phase (part of a movement vertical jump) in
the dynamic activity will produce vertical GRF force
2 to 3 times towards body weight (Handrigan, et al.,
2012; Sung, Paul S., 2016). Besides, Karlson (2000)
in Hong's (2016) study revealed that the vertical
component correlates to the GRF vector (vGRF)
deviation standard by using the Berg Balance Scale
(BBS) screening tool. It provided an equal value of
GRF similar to the force plate examination revealed.
What we found, force flat-form posturography (force
plate) generated to calculate the association of GRF
vector force resultant (vGRF) against basketball
student postural stability in static and dynamic
conditions.
From what we discovered, the pes planus
plantaris incident correlated to the subject's postural
stability significantly. On dynamic vertical jump
motion, GRF resultant towards vertical plane
generated 15.26 N, causing a decreasing trend of the
subject’s postural stability. The mean force resultant
towards vertical plane force in pes planus plantaris
was two times higher than normal foot arch subjects.
A similar analysis of pes planus plantaris athletes
also detected higher postural instability during
dynamic vertical jump loading response movement.
It was proven based on GRF force average resultant
to vertical plane forces (W) that vertical jump
loading response had a higher instability value rather
than vertical jump movement. This theory had a
similar finding to Primal (2018) that athlete’s
postural stability were significantly decreased and
disturbed through their postural sway area with the
range of center of pressure (CoP) (Primal, et al.,
2018).
In this final discussion, we conclude that weight-
bearing activities while exercising can increase the
incidence of pes planus plantaris. It relates to
Toullec's (2015) study which declared the
pathophysiological occurrence of pes planus
plantaris on weight-bearing condition. It would
continuously disrupt and reduce some supporting
structures function in a longitudinal medial arch,
especially in the posterior tibial tendon and plantar
fascia. As well as in Aydog's (2005) research, pes
planus plantaris on both lower extremities
commonly occur in handball player athletes (such as
basketball) with high-level weight-bearing activities.
Formation of pes planus plantaris will ultimately
affect postural stability in basketball student-athletes
(Aydog, S T., 2005; Toullec, E., 2015). We would
like to emphasize the importance of maintaining
plantar arch shape normalities. Pes planus plantaris
conditions will reduce postural stability which then
affects a person's performance in varied activities,
especially in athletes which required good
performance and excellences during practices and
games. We believe this conclusion is related to
Bressel et al (2007) and Sung (2015) studies that
subjects with flatfoot have greater GRF force
threshold than normal arch subjects. The disruption
of body stability will affect the athlete’s
performance. As we noticed, there is very little
previous research that analyzes the effect of pes
planus plantaris on athlete's postural stability,
specifically in sports with weight-bearing activities.
5 CONCLUSION
Concluded for about four-fifths of basketball
student-athletes in UNJ experienced pes planus
plantaris, it proved without significant association
on both sexes, however, the length of exercise
period they performed giving significant correlation.
Pes planus plantaris associated with decreasing of
postural stability range on athletes static, dynamic
vertical motion (vertical jump), and dynamic
shooting position (vertical jump loading response)
conditions.
REFERENCES
Aydog, S T. 2005. Differences in Sole Arch Indices in
Various Sports. British Journal of Sports Medicine
39 (2): e5–e5. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2003.011
478.
Aydog ST, HA Demirel, Tetik O. The sole arch indices
of the adolescent basketball player”. Saudi Med J.
2004 March 10; Vol. 25 (8): 1100-1102.
Boerum V, Drew H, and Bruce J Sangeorzan. 2003.
“Biomechanics and Pathophysiology of Flat Foot.”
Foot and Ankle Clinics 8 (3): 419–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00084-6.
Borton, David C, TS Saxby, DC Borton, T S Saxby, and
FRACS Orth. 1997. Tear Of The Plantar
Calcaneonavicular (Spring) Ligament Causing
Flatfoot” 79 (4): 3.
Bressel E, Yonker JC, Kras J, Heath EM.Comparison of
static and dynamic balance in female collegiate
soccer, basketball, and gymnastics athlete.” Journal of
Athletic Training. 2007 March; 42 (1): 42-46.
Chuckpaiwong, Bavornrit, James A. Nunley, Nathan A.
Mall, and Robin M. Queen. 2008. The Effect of Foot
Type on In-Shoe Plantar Pressure during Walking and
icSPORTS 2022 - 10th International Conference on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support
150
Running. Gait & Posture 28 (3): 405–11.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.01.012.
Clifford, Amanda Marie, and Heather Holder-Powell.
2010. Postural Control in Healthy Individuals.
Clinical Biomechanics 25 (6): 546–51.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.03.005.
Colo’, G., Mazzola, M. A., Pilone, G., Dagnino, G., &
Felli, L. (2021). Lateral open wedge calcaneus
osteotomy with bony allograft augmentation in adult
acquired flatfoot deformity. Clinical and radiological
results. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery &
Traumatology, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/
s00590-021-02888-3
Han, Jin Tae, Hyun Mo Koo, Jae Min Jung, Yeun Jung
Kim, and Jung Hoon Lee. 2011. Differences in
Plantar Foot Pressure and COP between Flat and
Normal Feet during Walking.” Journal of Physical
Therapy Science 23 (4): 683–85.
https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.23.683.
Handrigan, Grant A., Berrigan F, Hue O, Simoneau M,
Corbeil P, Tremblay A, and Teasdale N. 2012. “The
Effects of Muscle Strength on Center of Pressure-
Based Measures of Postural Sway in Obese and Heavy
Athletic Individuals.” Gait & Posture 35 (1): 88–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.08.012.
Headon, Robert, and Rupert Curwen. 2001. Recognizing
Movements from the Ground Reaction Force. In
Proceedings of the 2001 Workshop on Perceptive User
Interfaces - PUI ’01, 1. Orlando, Florida: ACM Press.
https://doi.org/10.1145/971478.971523.
Hong, Chih-Yuan, Lan-Yuen Guo, Rong Song, Mark L.
Nagurka, Jia-Li Sung, and Chen-Wen Yen. 2016.
Assessing Postural Stability via the Correlation
Patterns of Vertical Ground Reaction Force
Components.” BioMedical Engineering OnLine 15 (1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0212-z.
Kong, Zhaowei, Fengxue Qi, and Qingde Shi. 2015. The
Influence of Basketball Dribbling on Repeated High-
Intensity Intermittent Runs.” Journal of Exercise
Science & Fitness 13 (2): 117–22. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jesf.2015.10.001.
Koshino, Y., Samukawa, M., Chida, S., Okada, S.,
Tanaka, H., Watanabe, K., Chijimatsu, M., Yamanaka,
M., & Tohyama, H. (2020). Postural stability and
muscle activation onset during double-to single-leg
stance transition in flat-footed individuals. Journal of
Sports Science and Medicine, 19(4), 662–669.
Mazerolle, Stephanie M. 2007. “Cuboid Syndrome in a
College Basketball Player: A Case Report.Edited by
Joseph J. Piccininni. Athletic Therapy Today 12 (6):
9–11. https://doi.org/10.1123/att.12.6.9.
McCormack, Anne P, Randal P Ching, and Bruce J
Sangeorzan. 2001. Biomechanics of Procedures Used
in Adult Flatfoot Deformity.Foot and Ankle Clinics 6
(1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1083-7515(03)00
072-X
McCrory, J.L., M.J. Young, A.J.M. Boulton, and P.R.
Cavanagh. 1997. Arch Index as a Predictor of Arch
Height. The Foot 7 (2): 79–81. https://doi.org/10.10
16/S0958-2592(97)90052-3.
McKeag, Douglas, ed. 2003. Basketball. Handbook of
Sports Medicine and Science. Indianapolis, USA:
Blackwell Science.
Önell, Annica. 2000. The Vertical Ground Reaction
Force for Analysis of Balance? Gait & Posture 12
(1): 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(00)000
53-9.
Primal, D., Anatomi, D., & Bukittinggi, G. B. (2018). Pes
Planus Plantaris Terhadap Stabilitas Postural
Vertical-Jump Melalui Postural Sway Atlet Basket.
Razeghi, Mohsen, and Mark Edward Batt. 2002. Foot
Type Classification: A Critical Review of Current
Methods.” Gait & Posture 15 (3): 282–91.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00151-5.
Richie, Douglas H. 2007. Biomechanics and Clinical
Analysis of the Adult Acquired Flatfoot. Clinics in
Podiatric Medicine and Surgery 24 (4): 617–44.
Sung, Paul S. 2016. “The Ground Reaction Force
Thresholds for Detecting Postural Stability in
Participants with and without Flat Foot.” Journal of
Biomechanics 49 (1): 60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.jbiomech.2015.11.004.
Sung, P. S., Zipple, J. T., Andraka, J. M., & Danial, P.
(2017). The kinetic and kinematic stability measures in
healthy adult subjects with and without flat foot. Foot,
30, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2017.01.010
Toullec, E. 2015. Adult Flatfoot. Orthopaedics &
Traumatology: Surgery & Research 101 (1): S11–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.07.030.
Wikstrom, Erik A., Mark D. Tillman, Scott M. Schenker,
and Paul A. Borsa. 2008. Jump-Landing Direction
Influences Dynamic Postural Stability Scores.
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 11 (2): 106–
11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.014.
Yuji Ohta, Emi Anzai. 2014. Effects of Foot Arch
Structure on Postural Stability.Clinical Research on
Foot & Ankle 02 (02). https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-
910X.1000133.
Ahriyasna, R., Agustini, T. W., Djamiatun, K., & Primal,
D. (2021). The improvement of insulin resistance and
the antioxidant capacity in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats
with whiteleg shrimp shell powder (Litopenaeus
vannamei). Potravinarstvo Slovak Journal of Food
Sciences, 15, 703–711. https://doi.org/10.5219/1684.
Pes Planus Plantaris (Flat Foot) Decreases Postural Stability of Basketball Student-athletes through Ground Reaction Force Vector (vGRF)
151