market monopolization and structural imbalances. 
According to some authors, all transaction costs can 
be derived from information costs. 
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS 
In the modern world, internationalization is an actual 
trend in world economic development, by the middle 
of the 90s of the twentieth century. reached an 
unprecedented level. As an illustration of this 
phenomenon, the educational literature presents a 
huge number of diagrams demonstrating how the 
parts of one of the most ordinary cars are assembled 
in several dozen countries (Molchanova, 2019). In the 
middle of the 20th century, in the context of rapidly 
growing trade between countries and the creation of 
transnational corporations, it became necessary to 
create new concepts that would explain the 
prerequisites for the transition from the simplest form 
of internationalization, i.e. exports to more complex 
and mature forms, such as licensing, opening 
production units in foreign markets, creating joint 
ventures, etc. The American economist R. Vernon 
was one of the founders of the theory of 
internationalization and modern theories of 
international production. But before the publication 
of his works, there were already attempts to explain 
the principles of the development of international 
production and trade. Such theories include the 
classical theories of international trade (for example, 
the mercantilism of T. Man and V. Petty, the theory 
of absolute advantages of A. Smith, the theory of 
comparative advantages of D. Ricardo), as well as the 
neoclassical theory of international capital movement 
developed by Swedish scientists E. Heckscher and B. 
Olin, developed by the followers of the theory and 
formed in line with the neoclassical theory of 
international trade. The Japanese school was close to 
the main conclusions of R. Vernon's theory (Egorova, 
2020). Among the founders, we single out K. Kojima 
and T. Ozawa, who outlined the advantages of 
companies in the conditions of international capital 
mobility (the theory of “flying geese of 
development”). Scientists have proven that 
companies can contribute to the economic 
development of the host country, while pursuing their 
corporate goals. When choosing a location for 
locating production facilities, company management 
relies on two factors: location of production near end 
users (i.e. outside customs barriers) and access to 
resources to reduce production costs. J. Dunning in a 
series of his works (1980, 1981, 1988, 1992) 
published an eclectic theory of OLI-advantages, 
called the “eclectic paradigm of international 
production”, or Dunning's eclectic paradigm (Eclectic 
paradigm, or OLI paradigm). Dunning's theory is 
based on a set of OLI-advantages, that is, an investor 
makes a decision on foreign direct investment based 
on an assessment of three components (advantages): 
- Ownership / property (O advantages, or specific 
advantages of ownership). The volume of foreign FDI 
is explained by the nature and set of competitive 
advantages of foreign investors in comparison with 
domestic investors (possession of a unique 
technology or patent, a wide range of goods and 
services, a good reputation, a recognizable brand); - 
Location / location (L advantages, or specific location 
advantages). The advantage is determined by the 
peculiarities of the markets offered to foreign 
investors by individual countries in comparison with 
other countries (significant market capacity, low 
transport and labor costs, cheap raw materials); - 
Internationalization / Internationalization (I 
advantages, or advantages of internationalization). 
Benefits from the implementation of intra-company 
transactions (between branches of TNCs, companies 
of the same holding, etc.) in comparison with the 
execution of such transactions between independent 
entities in the market (Meckling, 2020). Advantages 
are also determined by the degree to which a company 
can internationalize, i.e. control its own competitive 
advantages, and not transfer or offer them to foreign 
companies, for example, through export or licensing 
(i.e., benefits from own use of assets, and not from 
transferring third party). The term 
“internationalization” is multifaceted. In the scientific 
works of foreign and domestic researchers of the 
second half of the XX - early XXI centuries. This 
concept is considered from different points of view. 
First of all, the question of the relationship between 
the concepts of “internationalization” and “economic 
globalization” remains debatable: some scientists 
consider globalization as the final stage of 
internationalization, the highest stage of 
internationalization of economic activity (Hibbard, 
2019) (therefore, it is understandable why they give 
the same definition to these concepts), and some - as 
a fundamentally new stage in the development of the 
world economy. However, if we look at the problem 
of measurement, then the assessment of globalization 
includes political, economic, cultural, environmental 
and other components, while internationalization 
includes only economic ones. Globalization is 
comprehensive and affects all aspects of life, not just 
the economic. We share the view of scholars that 
internationalization is the economic dimension of 
globalization.