income of households. Finally, social factors in 
ethnic areas can promote the increase of household 
economic income of farmers through inter-regional 
coordination and mutual synergy (Tokila, 2011). At 
the theoretical level, social factors in ethnic areas 
affect farm household income from the above three 
aspects, but the effect of their influence still needs to 
be tested empirically. In this paper, we will take the 
coordinated development of Tibet and Tibet-related 
regions in four provinces as the goal, analyze the 
influence of social factors in ethnic regions on 
farmers' household economic income through 
multiple regression and PSM models, explore the 
impact-related points that can be coordinated 
between Tibet and Tibet-related regions in four 
provinces, and further explore the path of 
coordinated and coordinated development of Tibetan 
society and economy in Tibet-related regions in four 
provinces (Chen, 2008). 
3  DATA FOUNDATION AND 
MODEL BUILDING 
3.1  Data Sources 
The data used in this paper come from micro 
household data from field research in Tibetan-
related areas in four provinces and Tibet, as well as 
macro data from the Sichuan Statistical Yearbook 
2020, Qinghai Statistical Yearbook 2020, Gansu 
Statistical Yearbook 2020, Yunnan Statistical 
Yearbook 2020, and the 2020 National Economic 
and Social Development Statistical Bulletin of 
representative cities and Tibetan autonomous 
prefectures. Among them, the research data 
specifically include Hongyuan County, Ganzi 
County, Ruoerge County, Markang County, Dafu 
County, and Danba County in Tibet-related areas of 
Sichuan; Diebe County, Zhuoni County, and Xiahe 
County in Tibetan areas of Gansu; Deqin County, 
Shangri-La County, and Weixi County in Tibetan 
areas of Yunnan; GuiDe County and Duran County 
in Tibetan areas of Qinghai and Lhasa City in Tibet 
Autonomous Region. A total of 480 questionnaires 
were distributed in the survey in Tibet-related areas 
of the four provinces, with 454 valid questionnaires 
and an actual recovery rate of 94.58%; a total of 780 
questionnaires were distributed in the survey in 
Lhasa, with 745 valid questionnaires and an actual 
recovery rate of 95.5% (Jiang, 2012). 
3.2  Explanatory Variables 
3.2.1  For Author/S of Only One Affiliation 
(Heading 3): To Change the Default, 
Adjust the Template as Follows 
In this paper, the economic income of farm 
households was selected as the explanatory variable, 
and the raw data were standardized in order to 
eliminate the effects of differences in the average 
income levels of different villages and the 
measurement unit scale. The formula is: 
𝑎 =
𝑎
−𝑎
𝑠
                                      (1) 
where, i denotes the states, a denotes the indicator to 
be standardized, denotes the mean of this indicator 
in Tibetan areas or Tibet-related areas in four 
provinces, and s denotes the standard deviation. 
3.2.2  Core Explanatory Variables 
In this paper, social factors related to farm 
households were selected as the core explanatory 
variables, firstly, telecommunication network 
situation included whether telecommunication was 
connected (1=connected, 0=not connected) and 
source of electricity (1=powered by national grid, 
0=self-generated); education situation was selected 
as the core explanatory variable for education level 
(1=uneducated, 2=not attended school but could 
read and write, 3=graduated from elementary school, 
4=graduated from junior high school, 5=general 
high school, 6= secondary school, vocational high 
school, 7=college undergraduate, 8=university 
undergraduate, 9=graduate and above), and 
transportation status was selected as the core 
explanatory variables (1=yes, 0=no). 
3.2.3  Control variables 
In this paper, health status (1=very bad, 2=bad, 
3=fair, 4=good, 5=very good), ethnicity (1=Tibetan, 
2=other), number of laborers, number of household 
yaks, employment status, and agricultural insurance 
coverage (1=insured, 2=uninsured) were selected as 
control variables. 
3.3  Model Establishment 
In order to avoid the problem of multicollinearity 
and eliminate the effects caused by differences in 
magnitudes, a multiple linear regression model (1) 
was established after standardizing some of the 
variables. Further, an OLS+ robust standard error 
model (2) was established to deal with the 
ICPDI 2022 - International Conference on Public Management, Digital Economy and Internet Technology