(10) can be reduced. The charging cost of each EV
can be allocated proportionally according to their
marginal cost:
𝑐
,
=
,
∑
,
𝐶
(13)
• EV revenue distribution of electric vehicles
The essence of the marginal effect of a single
EV on revenue: when the EV participates in power
trading, it shares the change of the power margin of
the rest of the EV by changing its own power
margin. The physical meaning of power margin is:
compared with the minimum power to meet the
user's demand, the EV has more spare power.
Demand response income distribution:
𝑦
,,
=
∑
∆
,
∑
∆
,
𝑌
,,∈
(14)
Income distribution of peak cutting and valley
filling:
𝑦
,,
=
∑
∆
,
∑
∆
,
𝑌
,,∈
(15)
Adjusting the income distribution of frequency
assisted services:
In the real-time phase, the more EV charging,
the more available capacity. Therefore, this part of
revenue can be directly based on the allocation of
EV capacity and charging time in this period.
𝑦
,
=
,
∑
,
𝑌
,
(16)
𝑦
,,
=
∑
∆
,
∑
∆
,
𝑌
,,∈
(17)
5 CONCLUSION
As a highly flexible distributed energy storage
method, V2G can participate in peak regulation,
frequency modulation, standby and other services
through bidirectional power flow between electric
vehicle and power grid during non driving period,
and support safe and stable operation of power grid.
With the increasing of the total number of electric
vehicles in the whole society, large-scale electric
vehicle V2G is a potential resource for grid
flexibility regulation.
This paper analyzes the cost and benefit of EV
aggregators participating in grid services, and
proposes the internal cost and benefit allocation
method of EV aggregators. The revenue of V2G
service providers is closely related to the electricity
price policy and whether there is a mature electricity
spot market and supporting service market. From
the actual situation of our country, the spot market
and auxiliary service market are still in the stage of
construction and trial operation, which is far from
mature operation.
In the current market environment, we can
consider appropriately relaxing the flexibility of
V2G, adjusting the access threshold of resources to
participate in the spot market of electric energy and
auxiliary service market, improving the
competitiveness of electric vehicle V2G, and
improving the enthusiasm of market players to use
V2G. Worldwide, although V2G is still in its
infancy, the large-scale development and application
of electric vehicles has made the V2G applications
widely available.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by State Grid Company
Science and Technology Project-Research on the
key technologies and market model design of the
Internet of Vehicles market trading to promote the
green energy consumption(5100-202040443A-0-0-
00).
REFERENCES
Electric vehicle fleet management in smart grids: A
review of services, ptimization and control aspects[J].
Renewable and unstainable Energy Reviews,
2016(56):1207-1226.
Liu Xiaofei, Zhang Qianfan, Cui Shumei. V2G Technical
Review of Electric Vehicles [J]. ET, 2012,27 (2): 121-
127.
Ma Xiufan, Yu Siyu, Zhu Sijia, et al. Research of profit
allocation to virtual power plant members based on
improved multifactor shapley value method[J].
Transactions of China Electrotechnical Society, :1-
11[2020-09-09]. https://doi.org/10.19595/j.cnki.1000-
6753.tces.191515.
Sarker M R, Dvorkin Y, Ortega-Vazquez M A. Optimal
participation of an electric vehicle aggregator in day-
ahead energy and reserve markets[J]. IEEE
Transactions on Power Systems, 2016, 31(5):3506-
3515.
Xing Qiang,Yang Qiming,Fan Juntai,et al.Electric
vehicle fast charging demand forecasting model based
on data-driven approach and human behavior
decision-making [J]. Power System Technology, 2020,
44(7): 2439-2448 (in Chinese).
ZHAO Baofu, ZHANG Yanju. Algorithm of shapley
value for cooperative games with dual fuzzy factors
[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2013,
49(19): 25-30.