The step of capturing the electro-optic image may 
occur at a time different from the time that the infra-
red image is captured. For example, the electro-optic 
image may be captured during daylight hours so that 
the object to be imaged is adequately illuminated to 
create a high resolution, low noise image having read-
ily identifiable edges. The corresponding infrared im-
age may be captured during periods of low light when 
the electro-optic detector is not effective. 
The step of transforming the IR image may occur 
in any of several ways, either alone or in combination. 
For example, the IR image may be transformed by ap-
plying an inverse filter using a Fourier transform 
based on the theoretical point spread function ("PSF") 
of the infrared detector. The IR image transformation 
may be based on the measured, rather than theoreti-
cal, point spread function for the infrared imaging 
system. The inverse filtering process utilizing either 
the theoretical or measured point spread function of 
the IR imaging system reduces the noise in the image 
and makes the transformed infrared image look 
“sharper” than the original one. The IR image may be 
filtered by applying the Wiener filter as an alternative 
to transform the IR image if noise is not neglectable. 
The inverse filter is a special case of the more general 
Wiener filter. 
The step of edge detection of the EO image in-
volves applying an edge detection algorithm to the 
EO image. The resulting edge-detected image com-
prises the detected edges. The step of registering the 
transformed IR image and the edge-detected EO im-
age may be as simple or as complex as the data re-
quire and involves the identification and matching of 
corresponding features on the IR and EO images. The 
step of blending the edge-detected EO image and the 
transformed IR image involves overlaying the de-
tected edges on the corresponding locations of the 
transformed IR image. The blending step may include 
blending of the original, un-transformed IR image 
with the transformed IR image and the detected 
edges. 
2.2  B. Second Innovative Method 
The method of the method can generate images of im-
proved resolution when only an IR image and no cor-
responding EO image is available. In this second 
method, the steps include (a) capturing an IR image, 
(b) transforming the IR image by applying a Wiener 
filter or an inverse filter using a Fourier transform 
based on either a theoretical point spread function or 
a measured point spread function of the infrared im-
age, (c) applying an edge detection algorithm to de-
tect the edges in the IR image, and (d) blending the 
edge-detected IR image, the original IR image and the 
transformed IR image to form a fused IR image. 
3  METHOD DESCRIPTION 
Figs. 1 and 2 are schematic diagrams illustrating the 
first method of the method. Fig. 1 shows the flow of 
information in the first method while Fig. 2 shows the 
method of the first method. As shown by Figs. 1 and 
2, an EO sensor captures an EO image. An IR sensor 
captures an IO image, either at the same or at a differ-
ent time from the capture of the EO image. The IR 
and EO images are registered to match features of the 
IR and EO images for use in blending the processed 
images. The EO image is analyzed using an edge de-
tection algorithm to detect differences in hue, color or 
intensity that may indicate an edge of an object. The 
result of the edge detection is an edge-detected EO 
image comprising the detected edges. The other in-
formation in the original image generally is omitted 
in the edge-detected EO image. As indicated by Fig. 
7, the edgedetected EO image may be further pro-
cessed by applying a small-size low pass filter to the 
edgedetected image. The IR image is transformed us-
ing either a Wiener filter or an inverse filter based on 
the point spread function of the IR sensor. The inverse 
filter is a particular application of the Wiener filter 
and comprises transforming the IR image using the 
point spread function of the IR sensor. The selection 
of either the Wiener filter or the inverse filter may de-
pend upon the noise level in the original IR image. If 
the original IR image has a high noise level, then the 
Wiener filter will be adopted to reduce that noise 
level. If the original IR image has little or no noise, 
then the inverse filter is the filter of choice. The 
method of the method may be configured to select the 
appropriate filter based on the noise level of the orig-
inal IR image. The point spread function of the IR 
sensor applied in either the Wiener filter or the in-
verse filter may be either a theoretical point spread 
function or a point spread function determined by 
measurement. As an optional step, the transformed IR 
image and the edge-detected image may be registered 
to match the detected edges in the edge-detected im-
age to the edges shown by the transformed IR image. 
The edge-detected EO image, the transformed IR 
image, and  the  original,  un-transformed  IR image