Fostering Innovative Work Behavior Among Plantation Workers in
North Sumatra, Indonesia by Applying Employee Growth Climate
Vivi Gusrini Rahmadani
a
, Rahma Fauzia
b
and Dina Nazriani
c
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Jl. Dr. Mansur, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Employee Growth Climate, Innovative Work Behavior, Plantation Workers, North Sumatra
Abstract: North Sumatra, Indonesia has a large plantation area and extensive agricultural industry, and this industry was
proven giving benefits for the national income of this country. However, to develop the national agro-industry
in the VUCA (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) era, innovative human resources in agro-
industry should become the building blocks for the companies to survive and to stay competitive. The current
study focuses on the effect of employee growth climate on innovative work behavior. 607 plantation workers
from one of the biggest companies in the agro-industry in North Sumatra, Indonesia were participated in this
research. The result show that to increase the employees’ innovative work behavior that consist of three
components: idea generation, idea promotion, idea implementation, the company should aware of its
organizational climate that support the employees to be innovative, which called employee growth climate.
A growth climate is an organizational climate or work environment which perceived by the employees where
the organizational practices, policies, and procedures encourage employee professional growth and
development. Thus, the companies in the agro-industry should adapt to the current disruptive business
challenges by nurturing the innovative behavior of their employee by providing supportive climate and
enforcing practices and policies that stimulate innovation.
1 INTRODUCTION
Every company or organization has a goal to be
achieved. Companies or organizations need assets
that can help achieve these goals. One of the most
valuable assets for the company is human resources
(HR). HR is all humans involved in a company in
order to strive for the realization of company goals.
The contribution of people within the company is the
most important thing for organizational effectiveness.
One of the contributions that employees must make is
to create new things in the company. A study says that
80% of ideas come from company employees and
only 20% come from planned innovations that have
been set by the company.
Innovation is a fairly broad and growing concept.
One form of innovation is innovative work behavior.
Innovation is at the organizational or company level,
while innovative work behavior is simpler.
Innovative work behavior focuses on people working
a
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3726-5585
b
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9600-3489
c
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1694-0414
in a company. Kheng, Mahmood, and Beris, (2013)
describe innovative work behavior as employee
actions directed at the generation, implementation
and implementation of new ideas, products,
processes, and methods for their job positions,
departmental units, or organizations.
Innovative work behavior is very important to
support the achievement of company or
organizational goals. Innovative work behavior can
change an organization, but unfortunately this
discussion is still often ignored or underestimated.
Much research has focused on innovation within
organizations, but little has focused on individual
processes for innovating. This is supported by the
opinion of Amo (2005) which states that most
researchers studying the process of change in
organizations mainly focus on organizational or
management characteristics that are the source of
innovation and organizational change initiatives, but
rarely studies that focus on employees. Furthermore,
446
Rahmadani, V., Fauzia, R. and Nazriani, D.
Fostering Innovative Work Behavior Among Plantation Workers in North Sumatra, Indonesia by Applying Employee Growth Climate.
DOI: 10.5220/0011904500003460
In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Social and Political Development (ICOSOP 2022) - Human Security and Agile Government, pages 446-451
ISBN: 978-989-758-618-7; ISSN: 2975-8300
Copyright
c
2023 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. Under CC license (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)
the innovative work behavior structure is not yet
robust enough to measure the required differences.
Janssen (2000) says that the ability to innovate
and improvise products, services, and work processes
is crucial in today's organizations. Every employee
needs both the desire and the ability to innovate if s/he
wants to realize her/his innovation. Research
conducted by Solomon, Winslow, and Tarabishy
(2004) found that organizational climate is an
essential factor that may influence innovative
behavior in individuals. Organizational climate
reflects the beliefs and psychological meanings of
each employee to the environment and tries to make
it happen. Organizational climate is defined as a set
of behaviors, attitudes, and feelings, which are seen
on a daily basis in the organizational environment and
every person from the organization experiences and
understands it. Moreover, organizational climate is
the perception that employees share, and the meaning
they associate with practices, procedures, policies,
and behaviors in the workplace that are supported,
valued, and expected by the organization. The current
study investigates the employee growth climate
which is in line with Schneider's (1975) argument that
the characteristics of organizational climate depend
on two climates, namely the overwork climate and the
employee growth climate.
This innovative work behavior can be seen in
Agro-industry companies, because the territory of
Indonesia is a very large area of agriculture and
plantations, especially in North Sumatra, known as an
agricultural country with advanced and developing
agro-industry. However, continual technological
advances, dynamic and unpredictable social and
political turmoil, as well as the pandemic situation
that has hit the whole world, including Indonesia, are
the main obstacles to strengthening the agro-
industrial sector. Despite many obstacles,
agribusiness has enormous potential to make a
significant contribution to the progress and change of
economic growth. In the context of developing a
national agro-industry in the VUCA (Volatility,
Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) era, the
government encourages the industry to take active
steps which include ensuring the achievement of
goals and objectives and continuing to foster a spirit
of innovation and improvement. so that business
actors are always ready to anticipate the worst
scenario.
The role of human resources for plantation
workers is seen as critical and strategic targets for
increasing competitiveness and productivity in the
industrial sector have been achieved in terms of the
contribution of agricultural exports to national
exports, but not in terms of human resources (HR)
productivity. This research has been conducted in
North Sumatra, Indonesia to describe the effect of
organizational climate, especially employee growth
climate on innovative work behavior among
plantation workers.
2 HYPOTHESIS DEVELOPMENT
Innovative work behavior is defined as the creation,
introduction, and application of new ideas in a job,
group, or organization to benefit the performance of
an individual, group, or organizational role, thereby
improving organizational function. Apart from that,
innovative work behavior is also defined as the
intentional development, introduction, and
application of new ideas in job roles, groups or
organizations for the appropriate roles of group or
organizational performance including adequate
promotion and application of creative ideas. Li and
Zheng (2014) suggest that innovative work behavior
is influenced by organizational innovation
atmosphere factors. Organizational innovation
atmosphere refers to individual perceptions about
whether the organization provides a conducive and
safe environment for learning and innovation, and to
what degree. The atmosphere of organizational
innovation will directly affect the innovative
behavior, capabilities and organizational
performance of employees. If employees perceive a
safe work environment (secure), then innovation
behavior is easier to implement.
Organizational innovation atmosphere is closely
related to organizational climate, organizational
climate is defined as a perception shared by
employees, and the meaning they associate with
workplace practices, procedures, policies, and
behaviors that are supported, valued, and expected by
the organization. The current study investigates the
employee growth climate as mentioned by
Schneider's (1975) that there were two climates,
namely the overwork climate and the employee
growth climate. The current study focuses on the
effect of employee growth climate on innovative
work behavior.
Organizational climate is related to an important
job investment, the climate of employee growth. A
high performance climate maximizes engagement,
resulting in better business outcomes. Studying the
influence of psychological safety climate on job
involvement in educational institutions. The study
revealed that a climate of psychological security
predicts the level of teacher involvement after one
Fostering Innovative Work Behavior Among Plantation Workers in North Sumatra, Indonesia by Applying Employee Growth Climate
447
year of increased job resources. The current study
adopts a similar approach, but focuses on the
employee growth climate, including organizational
practices, policies, and procedures that promote
employee growth and professional development.
Employee growth climate is related to the availability
of job resources where job resources increase
employee engagement. Various scholarly works have
documented how job resources such as performance
feedback, social support, job control, learning and
career opportunities, increase employee engagement.
When an organization views employee growth as
important, feedback practices reinforce learning and
innovation. Organizational policies that stimulate
employee careers provide a conducive and safe work
environment with a focus on the strengths of each
employee, namely the employee growth climate. The
higher the organizational climate that facilitates
employees to achieve goals by rewarding them when
they take responsibility and work, the more engaged
workers will be to fulfill their work goals.
Furthermore, the employee growth climate
encourages creative thinking and new solutions from
employees. Thus, a climate like this will strengthen
the connection of the workers involved to carry out
innovative work behaviors.
Thus, we formulate:
Ho: There is no positive relationship between
employee growth climate and innovative work
behavior.
Ha: There is a positive relationship between
employee growth climate and innovative work
behavior.
3 RESEARCH METHODS
3.1 Sample and Procedure
607 plantation workers were included in this research.
They all men and come from the biggest companies
in the agro-industry in North Sumatra, Indonesia
especially in producing the crude palm oil. The
measuremant scales were distributed directly to the
workers in a sealed enveloped due to a confidential
guarantee of their responses. The mean age of the
praticipants was 44.6 years (SD=7.7); and more than
half of the participants (59.6%) had completed
secondary education, and only less than 20% of them
had completed a higher education; futhermore, more
than half of the participants (56.5%) had over 20
years of job tenure. In sum, the workers were
experienced workers working in operational levels
with routine tasks in the plantation such as the planter,
the harvester, the land clearer, the plant nurture, and
so on. The entire data collection process took three
months due the varied sites and locations of the
company.
3.2 Measurument
The measurement scale consisting of two summated-
rating questionnaires, was used to measure innovative
work behavior and employee growth climate. All
items in the questionnaires were translated from
English into Bahasa Indonesia following the double
translation procedure.
a. Innovative Work Behavior
The four-item innovative work behavior
questionnaire was used to assess innovative work
behavior. Three components were involved: idea
generation, idea promotion, and idea application, with
sample items such as "I create new ideas for difficult
issues," "I make important organizational members
enthusiastic for innovative ideas," and "I introduce
innovative ideas into the work environment in a
systematic way." All items were measured on a rating
scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly
agree). Cronbach's alpha values for this scale were
0.92.
b. Employee Growth Climate
Six out of eight items of the employee growth climate
questionnaire developed by Schaufeli (2015) were
used. The plantation workers evaluated the extent to
which their organization encouraged their growth and
development. The sample of items included “In the
organization where I work, employees are
encouraged to come up with new ideas and
solutions.” All items were measured on a rating scale
ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly
agree). Cronbach's alpha values for this 7-item scale
were 0.79, whereas when eight items were used, the
values went down to 0.72. Thus, one item was
deleted.
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Descriptive Statistic
Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics. Table
1 presents the mean scores, standard deviations,
between the study variables.
ICOSOP 2022 - International Conference on Social and Political Development 4
448
Table 1: Mean scores, Standard Deviations, between the
Study Variables.
Table 1
N Min Max Mean
Std.
Deviation
IWB
607 9 45 30.75 7.449
EGC
607 11 30 25.01 2.688
Valid N
(listwise)
607
4.2 Testing of Hypotheses
Based on the results of a simple regression test, it is
proven that the significance value is 0.000 <0.05, so
it can be concluded that the employee growth climate
variable has an effect on the innovative work
behavior variable. Furthermore, seen from the simple
linear regression equation model, namely Y = a + b
X, then the value of Y changes to 11.224 + (.781) X.
This means that if innovative work behavior (Y)
increases, then employee growth climate (X) will
increase by .781. In other words, this research shows
that the higher the level of employee growth climate,
the higher the level of innovative work behavior.
Table 2.
Model
Unstandarized
coefficients
Standarized
Coefficients
t Sig.
Beta
Std.
error
Beta
Constant
EGC
11,224 2,719
.282
4.128 .000
.781 .108 7.224 .000
Based on the results of the model summary, the
magnitude of the relationship value is 0.282. From the
output, the coefficient of determination (R-squared)
is 0.078, which means that the employee growth
climate variable has a 7.8% impact on the innovative
work behavior variable.
Table 3.
Model R R Square
Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of
the Estimate
1 .282
a
.079 .078 7.153
4.3 Discussion
Based on the analysis, the results of the study reveal
that the employee growth climate has a positive
influence on the innovative work behavior of
employees. This result shows that the higher the level
of employee growth climate, the higher the
employees’ innovative work behavior. The results of
this test conclude that the research hypothesis is
supported. The result of this study is in line with
previous research that showed employee growth can
also be seen as a positive organizational climate that
provides employees with job resources and thus, from
Resource Conservation Theory, enabling employees
to achieve positive work outcomes, that is, innovative
work work. The higher the organizational climate that
facilitates employees to achieve goals by rewarding
them when they take responsibility and work, the
more strongly engaged workers will fulfill their work
goals innovatively. This is also in accordance with
research conducted by Solomon, Winslow, and
Tarabishy (2004) which found that organizational
climate is an essential factor that may influence
innovative behavior in individuals.
The results of the research between the employee
growth climate variable and innovative work
behavior have a relation of 0.282 and the coefficient
of determination (R Square) is .078, which implies
that the effect of the employee growth climate
variable on the innovative work behavior variable is
7.8%. This is in accordance with research that
organizational climate has an impact on innovation.
Churchill, Ford, and Walker (1976) have suggested
that organizational climate displays perceptions of
work situations, organizational characteristics and
how the relationships between employees in everyday
life. Several foreign studies have shown that
innovative behavior has nothing to do with
organizational climate. In line with previous research,
De Jong and Den Hartog (2008) found an
insignificant relationship between the two constructs.
Meanwhile, other studies say that there is a significant
relationship between innovative behavior and
organizational climate.
5 LIMITATION AND FUTURE
RESEARCH DIRECTION
This study only involves one source of data –from the
workers– and one method to evaluate our theoretical
model, which was a self-report measurement scale.
Spector claims that the issue of common method
variance (CMV), a bias that occurs when both
predictors and predicted variables come from the
same source, is exaggerated, however, we still
recommend future studies to collect data using
multisources and mix methodologies. Furthermore,
the current study relied on a small sample of data from
a single Indonesian agricultural holding company,
Fostering Innovative Work Behavior Among Plantation Workers in North Sumatra, Indonesia by Applying Employee Growth Climate
449
raising concerns about generalizability. Thus, caution
is advised when applying our findings to other
organizations. Again we suggest to future researcher
to replicate this study to increase the robustness of the
research model.
6 CONCLUSIONS
There is a positive and significant relationship
between employee growth climate and innovative
work behavior among the plantation workers. Hence,
the higher the workers perceived the company has
employee growth climate, the likely the worker will
show innovative behavior at work. Thus, organization
and management should aware that the way they
build certain climate in the organization, it relates to
the higher the workers will engage in innovative work
behavior. Innovative work behavior is crucial not
only in a non-routine-high technology jobs, but also
in the low-operational level jobs. This state-owned
company should nurture the innovative behavior of
their workers by providing supportive climate and
enforcing practices and policies that stimulate
innovation.
REFERENCES
Ansari, R., 2021. Kebijakan pemerintah dalam
pengembangan pertanian industri nasional di era vuca
[Dokumen WWW]. Kementerian. Republik Indonesia.
https://agro.kemenperin.go.id/artikel/6418-kebijakan-
pemerintah-dalam-pengembangan-agro-industri-
nasional-di-era-vuca (diakses 1.28.22).
Amo, B.W. 2005. Employee Innovation Behavior
(Unpublished dissertation). Bodø Graduate School of
Business Bodø Regional University, Norway.
Axtell, C., Holman, D., & Wall, T. 2006. Promoting
innovation: A change study. Journal of Organizational
Occupational Psychology, Vol. 79, No. 3, pp. 509-516.
Bunce, D. and West, M. A. 1996. Stress management and
innovation interventions at work, Human Relations.
Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 209-224.
Churchill, G. A. Jr., Ford, N. M., & Walker, O. C. Jr. 1976.
Organizational climate and job satisfaction in the sales
force. J. Mark. Res., No. 13, pp. 323- 332.
De Jong, J. & Den Hartog, D. N. 2008. Innovative work
behaviour: measurement and validation. November,
2008. Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and
SMEs. http://www.entrepreneurship-sme.eu/pdf-ez/h2
00820.pdf.
Dolar, MF, & Bakker, AB 2010. Iklim keamanan
psikososial sebagai cikal bakal lingkungan kerja yang
kondusif, masalah kesehatan psikologis, dan
keterlibatan karyawan. Jurnal Psikologi Kerja &
Organisasi, Vol. 83, pp. 579-599.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690.
Ekvall, G., & Ryhammer, L. 1999. The creative climate: its
determinants and effects at a Swedish university. Creat.
Res. J., No. 12, pp. 303-310.
Getz, I dan Robinson, A. G. 2003. Innovate or die: “Is that
a fact?”. Creativity and Innovation Management, (3),
130- 136.
Hackman, JR & Oldham, GR. 1980. Desain Ulang
Pekerjaan, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Hasibuan, S. 2000. Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia,
Gramedia. Jakarta.
Hobfoll, SE. 2002. Sumber daya dan adaptasi sosial dan
psikologis. Review Psikologi Umum, pp. 307-324.
Isaksen, S.G., & Lauer, K. J. 1999. The relationship
between cognitive style and individual psychological
climate: Reflections on a previous study. Studia
Psychologica, No. 41, pp. 177–191.
Janssen, O. 2000. Job demands, perceptions of effort–
reward fairness and innovative work behaviour.
Journal of Occupational and Organizational
Psychology, Vol. 73, 287–302.
Kheng, YK., Mahmood, R., Beris, SJH. 2013. A conceptual
review of innovative work behavior in knowledge
intensive business services among knowledge workers
in Malaysia. International Journal of Business,
Humanities and Technology, Vol. 3(2), 91–99.
Li, X. and Zheng, Y. (2014). The influential factors of
employees’ innovative behavior and the management
advices. Journal of Service Science and Management,
7, 446-450.
Momeni, M., Ebrahimpour, D. H., dan Ajirloo, D. M. B.
2014. Surveying the impact of inferential
organizational justice on innovative work behavior.
Singaporean Journal of Business Economics and
Management Studies, Vol. 2(9).
Ng, TW, & Feldman, DC. 2012. Perilaku suara karyawan:
Tes meta-analitik dari kerangka kerja konservasi
sumber daya. Jurnal Perilaku Organisasi, Vol. 33(2),
pp. 216-234.
Nursyamsi, M., 2020. Gelar Perkebunan Tambah daya
Mengatakan Lewat Kompetensi SDM [Dokumen
WWW]. Republik On line. URL
https://republika.co.id/share/qgckj4423 (diakses
1.28.22).
Pohan, VGR, 2011. Belajar di tempat kerja: keragaman
keahlian dan hubungan kinerja tim: peran mediasi
pembelajaran tim dan peran moderasi jenis tugas tim.
VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
Robbins, Stephen P dan Judge, Timothy A. 2013.
Organizational Behavior, Pearson Education. New
Jersey.
Schaufeli, WB. 2015. Melibatkan kepemimpinan dalam
model tuntutan pekerjaan-sumber daya. Pengembangan
Karir Internasional l, Vol. 20, pp. 446-463.
https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-02-2015-0025.
Schaufeli, WB & Taris, TW (2014). Tinjauan kritis model
tuntutan-sumber daya pekerjaan: Implikasi untuk
meningkatkan pekerjaan dan kesehatan. Dalam G.
Bauer & O. Hämmig (Eds), Menjembatani kesehatan
ICOSOP 2022 - International Conference on Social and Political Development 4
450
kerja, organisasi dan masyarakat: Pendekatan
transdisipliner (hlm. 43-68). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
Schneider, B. 1975. Iklim organisasi: Preferensi individu
dan realitas organisasi ditinjau kembali. Jurnal
Psikologi Terapan, Vol 60(4), pp. 459-465.
https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076919.
Schneider, B. & Reichers, A. 1983. On the etiology of
climates. Personnel Psychology. No. 36, 19-39.
Schneider, B., Yost, A. B, Kropp, A., Jenis, C., & Lam, H.
2017. Keterlibatan tenaga kerja: Apa itu, apa yang
mendorongnya, dan mengapa itu penting bagi kinerja
organisasi. Jurnal Perilaku Organisasi, Vol. 39, pp. 462-
480. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2244.
Setiawan, K., 2021. Asosiasi Agribisnis Prediksi Harga
Cabai Baru Turun Januari 2022. [online] Tempo.
Tersedia di: <https://bisnis.tempo.co/read/1538521/aso
siasi-agribisnis-prediksi-harga-cabai-baru-turun-januar
i-2022?page_num=2>.
Solomon, T. G., Winslow, K. E., & Tarabishy, A. 2004. The
role of climate in fostering innovative behavior in
entrepreneurial SMEs. Diunduh pada February 2, 2013,
dari http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/1998/USASBE
/98usa221.txt.
Spector, P. 2006. Varian metode dalam penelitian
organisasi: Kebenaran atau legenda urban? Metode
Penelitian Organisasi, Vol. 9, pp. 221-232.
10.1177/1094428105284955.
Thompson, G. 2010. Membangun budaya keterlibatan
karyawan yang tinggi. Strategic HR Review, Vol. 9(1),
pp. 25-31.
Fostering Innovative Work Behavior Among Plantation Workers in North Sumatra, Indonesia by Applying Employee Growth Climate
451