platform.  Among  them,  the  satisfaction  level  of 
teachers and students in  class  1 reached  80.2% and 
78.6%.  And  the  satisfaction  level  of  teachers  and 
students in  Class  2 reached 77.5%  and 83.1%. The 
satisfaction level of teachers and students in Class 3 
reached 79.7% and 82.1%. The satisfaction level of 
teachers and students in  class  4 reached  78.4% and 
80.9%. In  summary, the  virtual reality  platform has 
good  user  experience,  innovative  in  the  form  of 
communication,  and  can  realize  interactive 
functions,  which  can  better  promote  the 
dissemination of the concept of online teaching and 
cultural education (Abraham 2022). 
5  CONCLUSION 
Although  the  current  Internet  teaching  culture 
education  concept  dissemination  faces  many 
difficulties,  there  are  still  a  lot  of  sound 
improvement, now is still in a period. However, the 
dissemination  of  the  concept  of  Internet  teaching 
culture  education  has  a  very  key  significance  for 
guiding  college  students  to  form  a  correct  world 
outlook,  outlook  on  life  and  values,  promoting  the 
healthy  growth of  college  students'  personality,  and 
promoting  the  great development  and prosperity  of 
education,  which  must  be  paid  more  attention  to. 
This research  mainly uses digital  media  network as 
the  medium  to  discuss  the  theories  related  to  the 
development  of  cultural  education  thought  of  the 
network,  and  carries  out  some  experimental 
research, but  the ability is  limited, and  the research 
to be completed is far from enough. 
REFERENCES 
Alrousan M K, Al-Madadha A, Khasawneh M H A, et al. 
Determinants of virtual classroom adoption in Jordan: 
the case of princess Sumaya university for technology 
[J].  Interactive  Technology  and  Smart  Education, 
2022, 19(2):121-144. 
Abraham J, Geobey S. Digital elixir? The Aakash tablet as 
a social innovation in information and communication 
technology  for  development  (ICT4D)  [J].  Social 
Enterprise Journal, 2022, 18(2):288-305. 
F, Isakhanyan G, Dolfsma W, et al. A smart web of firms, 
farms  and  internet  of  things  (IOT):  enabling? 
collaboration-based  business  models  in  the  agri-food 
industry  [J].  British  Food  Journal,  2022, 
124(6):1857-1874. 
Gilhooly D, Htoo C M. More than names on a roster: the 
many  meanings  behind  Sgaw  Karen  names  [J]. 
Journal  for  Multicultural  Education,  2022, 
16(2):195-206. 
Lafkihi  M,  Kong  X,  Wang  C,  et  al.  The  impact  of 
gamification  on  teaching  and  learning  Physical? 
Internet:  a?quasi-experimental  study  [J].  Industrial 
Management  &  Data  Systems,  2022, 
122(6):1499-1521. 
Owusu-Agyeman Y, Moroeroe E. Professional community 
and  student  engagement  in  higher  education: 
rethinking  the  contributions  of  professional  staff  [J]. 
Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2022, 
7(2):126-143. 
Panigot,  Gillian.  Agriculture  Education  Center  Concept 
Approved [J]. Andrews Agenda: Campus News, 2019, 
2019(2):30-30. 
Song C  E. Internet of things  platform technology used  in 
undergraduate  nursing  student  education:  a  scoping 
review protocol [J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(4):221-2. 
Thi  N  D,  Thuy  N  T  M.  The  application  of  topological 
geometry  to  the  architectural  concept  design  process 
in  the  flow  of  digitalization  [J].  International  Journal 
of  Building  Pathology  and  Adaptation,  2022, 
40(3):422-440. 
Terzieva V, Ilchev S, Todorova K. The Role of Internet of 
Things  in  Smart  Education  [J].  IFAC-PapersOnLine, 
2022, 55(11):108-113. 
Terzieva  V,  Al-Madadha  A,  Khasawneh  M  H  A,  et  al. 
Determinants of virtual classroom adoption in Jordan: 
the case of princess Sumaya university for technology 
[J].  Interactive  Technology  and  Smart  Education, 
2022, 19(2):121-144.