community, and more than 80% in the Philippines,
Vietnam, and Malaysia. The majority of disabled
elderly people in China also want to choose to age at
home or in the community. Therefore, it is important
to identify and meet the long-term care needs of the
elderly with disabilities to promote the construction
of a community-based elderly care service system
and improve the quality of long-term care for the
elderly (Zhang, 1955) with disabilities. The study
found that there were differences in the ability levels
of disabled elderly people by age, gender, education
level, marital status, and residential status. The
(Activities of daily living) ADL is an important
indicator commonly used in academia to measure the
ability of older adults to care for themselves in daily
life and consists of the Somatic Self-Care Scale and
the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale.
interviews, participants were assessed for disability
in 4 key ADL tasks—bathing, dressing, walking, and
transferring (Hardy, 2004). The elderly with
disabilities were classified into three levels according
to the six indicators in the Self-Care of Somatic Life
Scale (eating, dressing, getting in and out of bed by
themselves, going to the toilet, walking around
indoors, and bathing): Mild disability (1~2 items
cannot be completed), moderate disability (3~4 items
cannot be completed) and severe disability (5~6
items cannot be completed) (Liu, 2019). According
to the design of the questionnaire, the 6 indicators of
ADL were replaced by the control of urination and
defecation in the bed. If the respondent answered
"don't need any help" for all 6 items, he/she is fully
self-care; if he/she answered "need help for one
item", he/she is partially self-care; if he/she answered
"need help for two or more items", he/she is unable
to take care of himself/herself.
The main innovations of this paper are as follows:
(1) Rehabilitation of the disabled elderly s lagging
in the current development path in China, and this
paper finds the main factors influencing the
consumption of elderly rehabilitation through
rehabilitation demand analysis.
(2) To investigate the rehabilitation needs of the
elderly with disabilities and to construct a
rehabilitation needs decision model by applying the
hierarchical analysis process.
2 OVERVIEW OF THE
HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS
CONCEPTION
The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP for short) was
proposed by Professor T.L. Saaty, an American
operations researcher, and applied in 1971 in the
study of contingency planning for the U.S.
Department of Defense, as a comprehensive
approach to system evaluation and decision-making
that integrates qualitative and quantitative analysis.
AHP has been widely used in many research areas
such as security, risk assessment, and related decision
problems.
2.1 Basic Characteristics
Complex decision problems are easy by identifying
complex problems as general objectives and then
setting them as minor ones based on several factors
that affect the general objective.
It combines quantitative and qualitative analysis,
expresses human subjective judgment scientifically
in a mathematical way, gives the weight of each
decision option reasonably, finds out the score of
each option, ranks the advantages and disadvantages
of each option, makes the optimal decision, and thus
solves complex practical problems.
2.2 Basic Principle
When studying a complex practical problem, the
problem to be studied is identified as the top goal,
then it is identified as a small goal based on several
factors affecting the total goal, and finally, a
progressive hierarchy is constructed based on the
hierarchical relationship between these related
several small goals, and these small goals are ranked
in order of merit, which is ultimately used as the basis
for problem decision making.
2.3 Calculation Steps
(1) Construct a structural model diagram. Construct a
hierarchical structure based on the indicators
affecting the event, while specifying the relationships
between the hierarchical factors.
(2) Constructing judgment matrix. Based on the
hierarchical model diagram, the relative importance
of the factors at (Zhang, 1955) each level needs to be
judged and presented in a numerical form.
(3) Hierarchical single ranking. The indicators
between the same level are ranked in importance in
terms of the magnitude of their influence on the
previous level.
(4) Overall ranking of levels. Combine the results
of the ranking between each level and calculate the
impact of the weight values on the overall index.