5 CONCLUSIONS
Several areas urgently need to be resolved
immediately, and it is hoped that the role of the triple
helix is to address community economic problems,
especially SMEs that have been affected by the
Covid-19 Pandemic and ecological and waste
problems. The three helixes have prepared
themselves by forming a structure to manage
cooperation, but these structures are not yet related.
The structure has been equipped with a work
program but has a different focus from one helix to
another. Apart from these obstacles, what can be
contributed by each helix is that the government can
play a role in training, capital, markets, and
networking in community empowerment.
Meanwhile, Higher Education can play a role in
strengthening human resources, networking,
innovation, and technology. At the same time, the
private sector can take the role of investment,
technology, and innovation.
Customary institutions have become a force equal
to other helices, especially in the Kerinci and
Sungaipenuh areas. Therefore customary institutions
can be included in the helix concept.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thank you to the parties who assisted in providing
information and data for this research. The chairman
of the DPRD for Sungaipenuh City, the Chancellor of
the Kerinci IAIN, the Kerinci Regency Government,
and the Customary Institution.
REFERENCES
A Brem, & A Radziwon. (2017). Efficient Triple Helix
collaboration fostering local niche innovation projects
– a case from Denmark. Technological Forecasting and
Social Change, 123, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.techfore.2017.01.002
A Strauss, & J Corbin. (2003). Penelitian Kualitatif.
Pustaka Pelajar.
Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and
competitiveness dynamics in Latin America. Small
Business Economics, 31(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s11187-008-9133-y
AJ Van Stel, MA Carree, & AR Thurik. (2005). The effect
of entrepreneurial activity on national economic
growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1996-6
Al-Hamidi, H., Edwards, A. A., Mohammad, M. A., &
Nokhodchi, A. (2010). Glucosamine hydrochloride is a
potential carrier in solid dispersion formulations to
enhance the dissolution rate of poorly water-soluble
drugs. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 76(1),
170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.10.030
Almasdi Syahz. (2003). Rancangan Model Pemberdayaan
Ekonomi Masyarakat Pedesaan Berbasis Agribisnis Di
Daerah Riau. Pembangunan Pedesaan, 3(2), 1–16.
B R Simbolon, T S Wibowo, & U Suherman. (2022). Social
Dynamics: Does it Have an Impact on the Existence of
Education? Ijd-Demos, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37950/
ijd.v4i1.214
Bernal, G., & Adames, C. (2017). Cultural Adaptations:
Conceptual, Ethical, Contextual, and Methodological
Issues for Working with Ethnocultural and Majority-
World Populations. Prevention Science, 18(6), 681–688.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-017-0806-0
F Casino, T K Dasaklis, & C Patsakis. (2019). A systematic
literature review of blockchain-based applications:
Current status, classification, and open issues.
Telematics and Informatics, 36(March), 55–81.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.006
FM Edoho. (2016). Entrepreneurship paradigm in the new
millennium: a critique of public policy on
entrepreneurship. Journal of Entrepreneurship in
Emerging Economies, 8(2), 279–294. https://doi.org/
10.1108/JEEE-08-2015-0043
G Secundo, G Schiuma, & G Passiante. (2017).
Entrepreneurial learning dynamics in knowledge-
intensive enterprises. International Journal of Entre-
preneurial Behavior & Research, 23(3), 366–380.
https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-01-2017-0020
Hasanah, L. L. N. El. (2018). Pengembangan Wirausaha
Muda Ekonomi Kreatif Berbasis Budaya di Daerah
Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 4(2), 268–
280. https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.36812
I.A. Ivanova, & L. Leydesdorff. (2014). Rotational
symmetry and the transformation of innovation systems
in a Triple Helix of university–industry–government
relations. Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 86(July), 143–156. https://doi.org/ DOI:
10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.022
J Ife. (2013). Community development in an uncertain
world. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/
doi:10.1017/CBO9781316342855
J Kolehmainen, J Irvine, L Stewart, Z Karacsonyi, T Szabó,
J Alarinta, & A Norberg. (2016). Quadruple Helix,
innovation and the knowledge-based development:
lessons from remote, rural and less-favored regions.
Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 7(1), 23–42.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0289-9
JJ Ferreira, CI Fernandes, & V Ratten. (2017).
Entrepreneurship, innovation, and competitiveness:
what is the connection? International Journal of
Business and Globalisation, 18(1), 73–95.
https://doi.org/ DOI:10.1504/IJBG.2017.081030
JL Curbello, & I Peña. (2012). Emprendimiento y
competitividad regional. Boletín de Estudios
Económicos, 67(205), 59–67.
JL González, A Jung, I.O Peña, Anyadike, & M Danes.
(n.d.). Innovation-oriented start-ups in Latin American